I started using git and have been using it for couple of months now, and I am curious if my workflow is correct. I work from two different places on the project. here are the stages of my workflow:
- I pull the project from remote repo
- make a local branch for a new feature
- make changes and commit
- merge the branch with master
- push to the remote
is this correct way of working on the project?
As Amber said :
First, let's just make something clear: there is no single "correct" workflow for Git. There are merely workflows that work - and specifically, workflows that work for you.
There is a good post on a blog about a good git workflow :
A successful Git branching model
You should read this post, it's really cool and you can adapt the workflow to your needs. In a nutshell, the workflow proposed by the blog post schematized like this :
I have adopted this workflow for a while. I try to always respect the workflow, whether it's a teamwork or working alone.
First, let's just make something clear: there is no single "correct" workflow for Git. There are merely workflows that work - and specifically, workflows that work for you.
The workflow you have outlined is typically referred to as a "feature branch" workflow (where you create a branch to work on a given feature/fix/whatever, and then merge it back), and is a perfectly legitimate workflow.
If you only ever work on a single feature at a time, you could choose to simply commit directly to master, then push the updated version. This becomes difficult, however, if you're working on multiple different features simultaneously (whereas a feature branch workflow handles many simultaneous features gracefully).
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7520276/git-workflow-tips