I’m about to start work on an API that will literally go from 0 RPS to a couple hundred thousand HTTP RPS at the same time and run at that rate for ~2 mins. All processing of those 30 million requests must finish by the end of that 2 min period. This would happen 7 times a WEEK.
Going serverless with Azure Functions in Consumption Plan Hosting Mode sounds appealing. This document describes that a scale controller exists to coordinate app instances, but doesn't really discuss what I can expect from it for HTTP triggers. I can’t find any info that says the scale controller will be able to respond in the time frame I'd need.
The best info I could find was this info saying it took nearly 8 mins to scale up for his tests.
Is this a bad use case for Azure Functions in consumption mode?
Obviously, spinning up a testing harness that is capable of issuing 30 million requests within 2 minutes is an undertaking of its own, and an expensive one. I'd like to learn from others who have already done so.
Based on my experience, this scenario is not properly covered by Consumption Plan. They can scale up to many instances, but not very rapidly. 2 minutes is way too fast to rely on.
I was mostly working with queues, not HTTP, but I got delays up to 40 minutes caused by low pace of scaling up.
If you can predict which 2 minutes are going to be heavy-loaded, your best bet could be to provision the capacity with a script (or another Function).
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45558305/is-azure-functions-running-in-consumption-mode-appropriate-for-massively-varying