jQuery: $().click(fn) vs. $().bind('click',fn);

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-11-26 21:36:13

For what it's worth, from the jQuery source:

jQuery.each( ("blur,focus,load,resize,scroll,unload,click,dblclick," +
    "mousedown,mouseup,mousemove,mouseover,mouseout,mouseenter,mouseleave," +
    "change,select,submit,keydown,keypress,keyup,error").split(","), function(i, name){

    // Handle event binding
    jQuery.fn[name] = function(fn){
        return fn ? this.bind(name, fn) : this.trigger(name);
    };
});

So no, there's no difference -

$().click(fn)

calls

$().bind('click',fn)

+1 for Matthew's answer, but I thought I should mention that you can also bind more than one event handler in one go using bind

$('#myDiv').bind('mouseover focus', function() {
    $(this).addClass('focus')
});

which is the much cleaner equivalent to:

var myFunc = function() {
    $(this).addClass('focus');
};
$('#myDiv')
    .mouseover(myFunc)
    .focus(myFunc)
;

There is one difference in that you can bind custom events using the second form that you have. Otherwise, they seem to be synonymous. See: jQuery Event Docs

There is the [data] parameter of bind which will occur only at bind-time, once.

You can also specify custom events as the first parameter of bind.

I find the .click() is way more logical, but I guess it's how you think of things.

$('#my_button').click(function() { alert('BOOM!'); });

Seems to be about as dead simple as you get.

If you have Google Chrome, their developer tools have an event listener tool, select the element you want to spy its' event.

You'll find that trying the both ways lead to the same result, so they are equivalent.

I prefer .bind() because of its interface consistency with .live(). Not only does it make the code more readable, but it makes it easier to change a line of code to use one method instead of the other.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!