I am trying to use Boost Spirit X3 with semantic actions while parsing the structure to an AST. If I use a rule without separate definition and instantiation it works just fine, for example:
#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/fusion/include/adapt_struct.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
namespace ast
{
struct ast_struct
{
int number;
std::vector<int> numbers;
};
}
BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(
ast::ast_struct,
(int, number)
(std::vector<int>, numbers)
)
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
using namespace std;
void parse( const std::string &data )
{
string::const_iterator begin = data.begin();
string::const_iterator end = data.end();
unsigned n(0);
auto f = [&n]( auto &ctx )
{
n = x3::_attr(ctx);
};
ast::ast_struct ast;
bool r = x3::parse( begin, end,
x3::int_[f] >> +( x3::omit[+x3::blank] >> x3::int_ ), ast );
if ( r && begin == end )
{
cout << "n: " << n << ", ";
std::copy(ast.numbers.begin(), ast.numbers.end(),
std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout << ast.numbers.size() << " elements: ", " "));
cout << endl;
}
else
cout << "Parse failed" << endl;
}
int main()
{
parse( "3 1 2 3" );
parse( "4 1 2 3 4" );
return 0;
}
Running the code above (compiled with flags -std=c++14) outputs the expected result:
n: 3, 3 elements: 1 2 3
n: 4, 4 elements: 1 2 3 4
Now I am trying to have my Spirit X3 parser organized more or less the same way as the calc 9 example from Boost Spirit X3, but it does not work:
- ast.hxx: defines the abstract syntax tree.
- grammar.hxx: user interface exposing the parser methods.
- grammar.cxx: instantiates the rules.
- grammar_def.hxx: parser grammar definition.
- config.hxx: parser configuration.
- main.cxx: parser usage example.
ast.hxx:
#ifndef AST_HXX
#define AST_HXX
#include <vector>
#include <boost/fusion/include/adapt_struct.hpp>
namespace ast
{
struct ast_struct
{
int number;
std::vector<int> numbers;
};
}
BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(
ast::ast_struct,
(int, number)
(std::vector<int>, numbers)
)
#endif
grammar.hxx:
#ifndef GRAMMAR_HXX
#define GRAMMAR_HXX
#include "ast.hxx"
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
namespace parser
{
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
using my_rule_type = x3::rule<class my_rule_class, ast::ast_struct>;
BOOST_SPIRIT_DECLARE( my_rule_type );
const my_rule_type &get_my_rule();
}
#endif
grammar.cxx:
#include "grammar_def.hxx"
#include "config.hxx"
namespace parser
{
BOOST_SPIRIT_INSTANTIATE( my_rule_type, iterator_type, context_type )
}
grammar_def.hxx:
#ifndef GRAMMAR_DEF_HXX
#define GRAMMAR_DEF_HXX
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
#include "grammar.hxx"
#include "ast.hxx"
namespace parser
{
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
const my_rule_type my_rule( "my_rule" );
unsigned n;
auto f = []( auto &ctx )
{
n = x3::_attr(ctx);
};
auto my_rule_def = x3::int_[f] >> +( x3::omit[+x3::blank] >> x3::int_ );
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE( my_rule )
const my_rule_type &get_my_rule()
{
return my_rule;
}
}
#endif
config.hxx:
#ifndef CONFIG_HXX
#define CONFIG_HXX
#include <string>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
namespace parser
{
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
using iterator_type = std::string::const_iterator;
using context_type = x3::unused_type;
}
#endif
main.cxx:
#include "ast.hxx"
#include "grammar.hxx"
#include "config.hxx"
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
#include <string>
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
using namespace std;
void parse( const std::string &data )
{
parser::iterator_type begin = data.begin();
parser::iterator_type end = data.end();
ast::ast_struct ast;
cout << "Parsing [" << string(begin,end) << "]" << endl;
bool r = x3::parse( begin, end, parser::get_my_rule(), ast );
if ( r && begin == end )
{
std::copy(ast.numbers.begin(), ast.numbers.end(),
std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout << ast.numbers.size() << " elements: ", " "));
cout << endl;
}
else
cout << "Parse failed" << endl;
}
int main()
{
parse( "3 1 2 3" );
parse( "4 1 2 3 4" );
return 0;
}
Compiling main.cxx and grammar.cxx (flags: -std=c++14) and running the code above prints:
Parsing [3 1 2 3]
0 elements:
Parsing [4 1 2 3 4]
0 elements:
I apologize for the long source code, I tried to make it as small as possible.
Please notice I have some usage for the unsigned n global variable, it will be used with a custom repeat directive (see question here and one of the solutions here). In order to keep the question focused I removed the repeat part from this question, so even though I could remove the semantic action in this example, it is not a possible solution.
I would appreciate some help to get this issue uncovered, it is not clear to me why the code above does not work. Thank you in advance.
I must admit actually reconstructing your sample was a bit too much work for me (call me lazy...).
However, I know the answer and a trick to make your life simpler.
The Answer
Semantic actions on a rule definition inhibit automatic attribute propagation. From the Qi docs (the same goes for X3, but I always lose the link to the docs):
r = p;Rule definition
This is equivalent to r %= p (see below) if there are no semantic actions attached anywhere in p.r %= p; Auto-rule definition
The attribute of p should be compatible with the synthesized attribute of r. When p is successful, its attribute is automatically propagated to r's synthesized attribute.
The Trick
You can inject state (your n reference, in this case) using the x3::with<> directive. That way you don't have the namespace global (n) and can make the parser reentrant, threadsafe etc.
Here's my "simplist" take on things, in a single file:
namespace parsing {
x3::rule<struct parser, ast::ast_struct> parser {"parser"};
struct state_tag { };
auto record_number = [](auto &ctx) {
unsigned& n = x3::get<state_tag>(ctx);
n = x3::_attr(ctx);
};
auto parser_def = x3::rule<struct parser_def, ast::ast_struct> {}
%= x3::int_[record_number] >> +(x3::omit[+x3::blank] >> x3::int_);
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE(parser)
}
Tip: run the demo with
=instead of the%=to see the difference in behaviour!
Note that get<state_tag>(ctx) returns a reference_wrapper<unsigned> just because we use the parser as follows:
void parse(const std::string &data) {
using namespace std;
ast::ast_struct ast;
unsigned n;
auto parser = x3::with<parsing::state_tag>(ref(n)) [parsing::parser] >> x3::eoi;
if (x3::parse(data.begin(), data.end(), parser, ast)) {
cout << "n: " << n << ", ";
copy(ast.numbers.begin(), ast.numbers.end(), ostream_iterator<int>(cout << ast.numbers.size() << " elements: ", " "));
cout << "\n";
} else
cout << "Parse failed\n";
}
Live Demo
#include <boost/fusion/include/adapt_struct.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/home/x3.hpp>
#include <iostream>
namespace ast {
struct ast_struct {
int number;
std::vector<int> numbers;
};
}
BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(ast::ast_struct, number, numbers)
namespace x3 = boost::spirit::x3;
namespace parsing {
x3::rule<struct parser, ast::ast_struct> parser {"parser"};
struct state_tag { };
auto record_number = [](auto &ctx) {
unsigned& n = x3::get<state_tag>(ctx); // note: returns reference_wrapper<T>
n = x3::_attr(ctx);
};
auto parser_def = x3::rule<struct parser_def, ast::ast_struct> {}
%= x3::int_[record_number] >> +(x3::omit[+x3::blank] >> x3::int_);
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEFINE(parser)
}
void parse(const std::string &data) {
using namespace std;
ast::ast_struct ast;
unsigned n = 0;
auto parser = x3::with<parsing::state_tag>(ref(n)) [parsing::parser] >> x3::eoi;
if (x3::parse(data.begin(), data.end(), parser, ast)) {
cout << "n: " << n << ", ";
copy(ast.numbers.begin(), ast.numbers.end(), ostream_iterator<int>(cout << ast.numbers.size() << " elements: ", " "));
cout << "\n";
} else
cout << "Parse failed\n";
}
int main() {
parse("3 1 2 3");
parse("4 1 2 3 4");
}
Prints
n: 3, 3 elements: 1 2 3
n: 4, 4 elements: 1 2 3 4
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33929849/boost-spirit-x3-ast-not-working-with-semantic-actions-when-using-separate-rule-d