C++11 constructor argument: std::move and value or std::forward and rvalue reference

问题

Which of the below two should be preferred and why?

struct X {
    Y data_;
    explicit X(Y&& data): data_(std::forward<Y>(data)) {}
};

vs

struct X {
    Y data_;
    explicit X(Y data): data_(std::move(data)) {}
};

回答1:

The two variants differ in functionality. The following statements work for the second one–but not for the first one:

Y y;
X x(y);

If you are looking for the same functionality, the two variants should look as follows:

struct X
{
    Y data_;
    explicit X(const Y& data) : data_(data) { }
    explicit X(Y&& data) : data_(std::move(data)) { }
};

struct X
{
    Y data_;
    explicit X(Y data) : data_(std::move(data)) { }
};

The first variant saves one move operation, whereas the second variant is less to write. So, the answer is: Use the latter as long as you have no reason to optimize the performance.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22332333/c11-constructor-argument-stdmove-and-value-or-stdforward-and-rvalue-refer