问题
I'm working on an abstract class where the implementing class needs to implement a list of T. The problem is that this doesn't work:
public class AbstractClass
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass
{
public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}
I'm sure that there is an obvious answer that I'm missing, and I know that I can build an abstract base type to put in the list, but when I use my Linq command to build the list, the abstract type (ItemBase) doesn't play nicely with the .ToList() method. Is what I'm trying to do so unique?
回答1:
You need the declaration on the class as well, to know what type T
is:
public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}
You can also restrict what T can be, like say it must implement IWidgets
:
public class AbstractClass<T> where T : IWidgets
回答2:
- You need to declare the type T.
- You need to declare the class AbstractClass as abstract.
- You need to use the override keyword.
Try this:
public class Widgets { }
public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
public override List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}
回答3:
You need to make AbstractClass
generic
public class AbstractClass<T> {
...
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets> { ...
}
回答4:
You need to mark AbstractClass
abstract
, because it contains abstract propertySpecify the generic type in the
AbstractClass
declarationImplement abstract property with
override
public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
public override List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}
回答5:
You need to define T like so
public class AbstractClass<T>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widget>
{
public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}
回答6:
You need to specify the type in the abstract class:
public class AbstractClass<T>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}
回答7:
You are missing to define abstract keyword for your AbstractClass class and also you need to add override keyword for Container Class Items property. I am giving the example code which will run for sure.
namespace AbstractGeneric
{
public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Name { get; set; }
public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}
public class Widgets
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
public override List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
public Container()
{
Items = new List<Widgets>();
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Container c = new Container();
c.Items.Add(new Widgets() { ID = 1, Name = "Sample Widget 1" });
c.Items.Add(new Widgets() { ID = 2, Name = "Sample Widget 2" });
foreach (Widgets item in c.Items)
{
Console.WriteLine(item.ID + " : " + item.Name);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2359540/using-generics-in-abstract-classes