问题
I want to be able to unit test an Observable
that has a delayed emission, but without actually waiting for the delay time. Is there a way to do this?
I'm currently using a CountDownHatch to delay the assert, and that works fine, but increases the test run time.
Example:
val myObservable: PublishSubject<Boolean> = PublishSubject.create<Boolean>()
fun myObservable(): Observable<Boolean> = myObservable.delay(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
@Test
fun testMyObservable() {
val testObservable = myObservable().test()
myObservable.onNext(true)
// val lock = CountDownLatch(1)
// lock.await(3100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
testObservable.assertValue(true)
}
回答1:
I was able to come up with a complete solution thanks to @aaron-he's answer.
It uses a combination of TestScheduler
to advance the time and also RxJavaPlugins
to override the default scheduler with the testScheduler. This allowed testing the myObservable()
function without modification or needing to pass in a Scheduler
.
@Before
fun setUp() = RxJavaPlugins.reset()
@After
fun tearDown() = RxJavaPlugins.reset()
@Test
fun testMyObservable() {
val testScheduler = TestScheduler()
RxJavaPlugins.setComputationSchedulerHandler { testScheduler }
val testObservable = myObservable().test()
myObservable.onNext(true)
testScheduler.advanceTimeBy(2, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
testObservable.assertEmpty()
testScheduler.advanceTimeBy(2, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
testObservable.assertValue(true)
}
回答2:
TestScheduler is perfect for this. It has a handy method advanceTimeBy(long, TimeUnit)
allows you to control the timing. And Observable.delay
has an overload method takes a Scheduler
.
So just use the default Scheduler.computation()
in the myObservable
function, and use TestScheduler
for unit testing.
回答3:
Found some strange behaviour of PublishSubject
it need some time for subscribe, for example the test is failed:
private val scheduler = TestScheduler()
@Test
fun publishSubjectFailedTest() {
val callback: DelayCallback = mock()
val myPublishSubject: PublishSubject<Boolean> = PublishSubject.create()
myPublishSubject
.delay(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS, scheduler)
.subscribeOn(scheduler)
.observeOn(scheduler)
.subscribe(
Consumer<Boolean> {
callback.onCalldown()
},
Consumer<Throwable> {
},
Action {
}
)
myPublishSubject.onNext(true)
scheduler.advanceTimeBy(20, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
verify(callback, times(1)).onCalldown()
}
But if we add a time of scheduler
before call onNext
, for example scheduler.advanceTimeBy(1, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
then the test will be success:
@Test
fun publishSubjectSuccessTest() {
val callback: DelayCallback = mock()
val myPublishSubject: PublishSubject<Boolean> = PublishSubject.create()
myPublishSubject
.delay(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS, scheduler)
.subscribeOn(scheduler)
.observeOn(scheduler)
.subscribe(
Consumer<Boolean> {
callback.onCalldown()
},
Consumer<Throwable> {
},
Action {
}
)
scheduler.advanceTimeBy(1, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)//added time of scheduler
myPublishSubject.onNext(true)
scheduler.advanceTimeBy(20, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
verify(callback, times(1)).onCalldown()
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47296993/unit-testing-rxjava-observables-that-have-a-delay