问题
I have a problem understanding why shared_ptr is using atomic cpu instructions... I cant figure out the reasons because it is NOT thread safe. Can somebody please explain.
If you wonder know how I know that it uses atomic intstuructions: there was a clip from C++ and beyond where Herb and Andrei talk about it, but they never mention the reasons why is it like that.
回答1:
Any instance of shared_ptr is multi-thread safe. The data it points to is not multi-thread safe. See this.
The atomic instructions, if properly applied (protection done in the same order by competing thread access) is one way to implement thread safety. Another way is by use of mutexes.
See a similar question for BOOST: Is boost shared_ptr xxx thread safe?
回答2:
Herb Sutter just used shared_ptr as a nice example in his gotw 95, he goes there to elaborate on design decision:
https://herbsutter.com/2014/01/13/gotw-95-solution-thread-safety-and-synchronization/
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8980328/why-is-stdshared-ptr-using-atomic-cpu-operations