Visual Studio Vs Visual Web Developer

对着背影说爱祢 提交于 2019-12-04 08:54:29

As far as I understand, Visual Web Developer (VWD) is simply a free version of the Visual Studio components necessary to develop web based solutions.

Here is a list of features missing from VWD that you get in a Professional edition of Visual Studio 2008 (VS2008). In short, VWD Express 2005

  1. is Not Extensibile with other add-ons or third party tools

  2. Only supports Web site projects (2005). You cannot add a Class Library project or a Web Controls Library project to the solution.

UPDATED - VWD 2008 SP1 also allows Web Application and Class Library Projects in the solution.

  1. Lacks the ability to combine Source Code Control

  2. has no Accessibility checker

  3. Lacks ability for automatic generation of resources for localization

  4. Cannot attach debugger to a process

  5. has no Native code debugging

The obvious advantage of VWD over VS2008 is that it is free and if you can work smart with it given the missing features, it may be the more pragmatic option for you. If those are features that you can't live without, VS2008 may be a wise investment - you also get all of the features missing from other Express products (Visual Basic 2008, Visual C# 2008, etc).

Take a look at MSDN's comparison chart for Visual Studio 2005. I can't find 2008's but would suspect it to be very similar.

Visual Studio will allow you to integerate with Source control and attached debugging to IIS processes.

As a lone developer knocking up some pure ASP.NET-MVC application then Web Developer would do, for serious work you really need studio.

I think you also lack the ability to publish a site without visual studio, you can certainly run a website, but it won't build the binaries for release, with web developer you have to publish the source to iis.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!