问题
I have a many objects of type Slot in an array list.
Slot class is as shown below-
Slot{
int start;
int end;
}
let the list of type List<Slot> be called slots. The slots are sorted based on start time. End time of one slot may be equal to start time of next slot, but they would never overlap.
Is there any possible way in which I can iterate over this list using Java 8 streams, and combine two slots if end time of one matches start time of next and output them into an ArrayList?
回答1:
Such scenario is perfectly supported by my free StreamEx library which enhances standard Stream API. There's an intervalMap intermediate operation which is capable to collapse several adjacent stream elements to the single element. Here's complete example:
// Slot class and sample data are taken from @Andreas answer
List<Slot> slots = Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7),
new Slot(8, 10), new Slot(10, 11), new Slot(11, 13));
List<Slot> result = StreamEx.of(slots)
.intervalMap((s1, s2) -> s1.end == s2.start,
(s1, s2) -> new Slot(s1.start, s2.end))
.toList();
System.out.println(result);
// Output: [3-7, 8-13]
The intervalMap method takes two parameters. The first is a BiPredicate accepting two adjacent elements from the input stream and returns true if they must be merged (here the condition is s1.end == s2.start). The second parameter is a BiFunction which takes the first and the last elements from the merged series and produces the resulting element.
Note that if you have, for example 100 adjacent slots which should be combined into one, this solution does not create 100 intermediate objects (like in @Misha's answer, which is nevertheless very interesting), it tracks first and last slot in the series immediately forgetting about intermediate onces. Of course this solution is parallel friendly. If you have many thousands of input slots, using .parallel() may improve the performance.
Note that current implementation will recreate the Slot even if it's not merged with anything. In this case the BinaryOperator receives the same Slot parameter twice. If you want to optimize this case, you can make additional check like s1 == s2 ? s1 : ...:
List<Slot> result = StreamEx.of(slots)
.intervalMap((s1, s2) -> s1.end == s2.start,
(s1, s2) -> s1 == s2 ? s1 : new Slot(s1.start, s2.end))
.toList();
回答2:
Since these types of questions come up a lot, I thought it might be an interesting exercise to write a collector that would group adjacent elements by a predicate.
Assuming we can add combining logic to the Slot class
boolean canCombine(Slot other) {
return this.end == other.start;
}
Slot combine(Slot other) {
if (!canCombine(other)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException();
}
return new Slot(this.start, other.end);
}
the groupingAdjacent collector can then be used as follows:
List<Slot> combined = slots.stream()
.collect(groupingAdjacent(
Slot::canCombine, // test to determine if two adjacent elements go together
reducing(Slot::combine), // collector to use for combining the adjacent elements
mapping(Optional::get, toList()) // collector to group up combined elements
));
Alternatively, second parameter can be collectingAndThen(reducing(Slot::combine), Optional::get) and the third argument be toList()
Here's the source for groupingAdjacent. It can handle null elements and is parallel-friendly. With a bit more hassle, a similar thing can be done with a Spliterator.
public static <T, AI, I, AO, R> Collector<T, ?, R> groupingAdjacent(
BiPredicate<? super T, ? super T> keepTogether,
Collector<? super T, AI, ? extends I> inner,
Collector<I, AO, R> outer
) {
AI EMPTY = (AI) new Object();
// Container to accumulate adjacent possibly null elements. Adj can be in one of 3 states:
// - Before first element: curGrp == EMPTY
// - After first element but before first group boundary: firstGrp == EMPTY, curGrp != EMPTY
// - After at least one group boundary: firstGrp != EMPTY, curGrp != EMPTY
class Adj {
T first, last; // first and last elements added to this container
AI firstGrp = EMPTY, curGrp = EMPTY;
AO acc = outer.supplier().get(); // accumlator for completed groups
void add(T t) {
if (curGrp == EMPTY) /* first element */ {
first = t;
curGrp = inner.supplier().get();
} else if (!keepTogether.test(last, t)) /* group boundary */ {
addGroup(curGrp);
curGrp = inner.supplier().get();
}
inner.accumulator().accept(curGrp, last = t);
}
void addGroup(AI group) /* group can be EMPTY, in which case this should do nothing */ {
if (firstGrp == EMPTY) {
firstGrp = group;
} else if (group != EMPTY) {
outer.accumulator().accept(acc, inner.finisher().apply(group));
}
}
Adj merge(Adj other) {
if (other.curGrp == EMPTY) /* other is empty */ {
return this;
} else if (this.curGrp == EMPTY) /* this is empty */ {
return other;
} else if (!keepTogether.test(last, other.first)) /* boundary between this and other*/ {
addGroup(this.curGrp);
addGroup(other.firstGrp);
} else if (other.firstGrp == EMPTY) /* other container is single-group. prepend this.curGrp to other.curGrp*/ {
other.curGrp = inner.combiner().apply(this.curGrp, other.curGrp);
} else /* other Adj contains a boundary. this.curGrp+other.firstGrp form a complete group. */ {
addGroup(inner.combiner().apply(this.curGrp, other.firstGrp));
}
this.acc = outer.combiner().apply(this.acc, other.acc);
this.curGrp = other.curGrp;
this.last = other.last;
return this;
}
R finish() {
AO combined = outer.supplier().get();
if (curGrp != EMPTY) {
addGroup(curGrp);
assert firstGrp != EMPTY;
outer.accumulator().accept(combined, inner.finisher().apply(firstGrp));
}
return outer.finisher().apply(outer.combiner().apply(combined, acc));
}
}
return Collector.of(Adj::new, Adj::add, Adj::merge, Adj::finish);
}
回答3:
You can do it using the reduce() method with U being another List<Slot>, but it's a lot more convoluted than just doing it in a for loop, unless parallel processing is required.
See end of answer for test setup.
Here is the for loop implementation:
List<Slot> mixed = new ArrayList<>();
Slot last = null;
for (Slot slot : slots)
if (last == null || last.end != slot.start)
mixed.add(last = slot);
else
mixed.set(mixed.size() - 1, last = new Slot(last.start, slot.end));
Output
[3-5, 5-7, 8-10, 10-11, 11-13]
[3-7, 8-13]
Here is the stream reduce implementation:
List<Slot> mixed = slots.stream().reduce((List<Slot>)null, (list, slot) -> {
System.out.println("accumulator.apply(" + list + ", " + slot + ")");
if (list == null) {
List<Slot> newList = new ArrayList<>();
newList.add(slot);
return newList;
}
Slot last = list.get(list.size() - 1);
if (last.end != slot.start)
list.add(slot);
else
list.set(list.size() - 1, new Slot(last.start, slot.end));
return list;
}, (list1, list2) -> {
System.out.println("combiner.apply(" + list1 + ", " + list2 + ")");
if (list1 == null)
return list2;
if (list2 == null)
return list1;
Slot lastOf1 = list1.get(list1.size() - 1);
Slot firstOf2 = list2.get(0);
if (lastOf1.end != firstOf2.start)
list1.addAll(list2);
else {
list1.set(list1.size() - 1, new Slot(lastOf1.start, firstOf2.end));
list1.addAll(list2.subList(1, list2.size()));
}
return list1;
});
Output
accumulator.apply(null, 3-5)
accumulator.apply([3-5], 5-7)
accumulator.apply([3-7], 8-10)
accumulator.apply([3-7, 8-10], 10-11)
accumulator.apply([3-7, 8-11], 11-13)
[3-5, 5-7, 8-10, 10-11, 11-13]
[3-7, 8-13]
Changing it for parallel (multi-threaded) processing:
List<Slot> mixed = slots.stream().parallel().reduce(...
Output
accumulator.apply(null, 8-10)
accumulator.apply(null, 3-5)
accumulator.apply(null, 10-11)
accumulator.apply(null, 11-13)
combiner.apply([10-11], [11-13])
accumulator.apply(null, 5-7)
combiner.apply([3-5], [5-7])
combiner.apply([8-10], [10-13])
combiner.apply([3-7], [8-13])
[3-5, 5-7, 8-10, 10-11, 11-13]
[3-7, 8-13]
Caveat
If slots is an empty list, the for loop version results in an empty list, and the streams version results is a null value.
Test Setup
All the above code used the following Slot class:
class Slot {
int start;
int end;
Slot(int start, int end) {
this.start = start;
this.end = end;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return this.start + "-" + this.end;
}
}
The slots variable was defined as:
List<Slot> slots = Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7), new Slot(8, 10), new Slot(10, 11), new Slot(11, 13));
Both slots and the result mixed are printed using:
System.out.println(slots);
System.out.println(mixed);
回答4:
It's a two-liner:
List<Slot> condensed = new LinkedList<>();
slots.stream().reduce((a,b) -> {if (a.end == b.start) return new Slot(a.start, b.end);
condensed.add(a); return b;}).ifPresent(condensed::add);
If the fields of slot are not visible, you will have to change a.end to a.getEnd(), etc
Some test code with some edge cases:
List<List<Slot>> tests = Arrays.asList(
Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7), new Slot(8, 10), new Slot(10, 11), new Slot(11, 13)),
Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7), new Slot(8, 10), new Slot(10, 11), new Slot(12, 13)),
Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7)),
Collections.emptyList());
for (List<Slot> slots : tests) {
List<Slot> condensed = new LinkedList<>();
slots.stream().reduce((a, b) -> {if (a.end == b.start) return new Slot(a.start, b.end);
condensed.add(a); return b;}).ifPresent(condensed::add);
System.out.println(condensed);
}
Output:
[3-7, 8-13]
[3-7, 8-11, 12-13]
[3-7]
[]
回答5:
If you add the following method to your Slot class
public boolean join(Slot s) {
if(s.start != end)
return false;
end = s.end;
return true;
}
you can perform the entire operation using the standard API the following way
List<Slot> result = slots.stream().collect(ArrayList::new,
(l, s)-> { if(l.isEmpty() || !l.get(l.size()-1).join(s)) l.add(s); },
(l1, l2)-> l1.addAll(
l1.isEmpty()||l2.isEmpty()||!l1.get(l1.size()-1).join(l2.get(0))?
l2: l2.subList(1, l2.size()))
);
This obeys the contract of the API (unlike abusing reduce) and will therefore works seamlessly with parallel streams (though you need really large source lists to benefit from parallel execution).
However, the solution above uses in-place joining of Slots which is only acceptable if you don’t need the source list/items anymore. Otherwise, or if you use immutable Slot instances only, you have to create new Slot instance representing joint slots.
One possible solution looks like
BiConsumer<List<Slot>,Slot> joinWithList=(l,s) -> {
if(!l.isEmpty()) {
Slot old=l.get(l.size()-1);
if(old.end==s.start) {
l.set(l.size()-1, new Slot(old.start, s.end));
return;
}
}
l.add(s);
};
List<Slot> result = slots.stream().collect(ArrayList::new, joinWithList,
(l1, l2)-> {
if(!l2.isEmpty()) {
joinWithList.accept(l1, l2.get(0));
l1.addAll(l2.subList(1, l2.size()));
}
}
);
回答6:
A clean (parallel safe) solution that doesn't require any new methods:
List<Slot> condensed = slots.stream().collect(LinkedList::new,
(l, s) -> l.add(l.isEmpty() || l.getLast().end != s.start ?
s : new Slot(l.removeLast().start, s.end)),
(l, l2) -> {if (!l.isEmpty() && !l2.isEmpty() && l.getLast().end == l2.getFirst().start) {
l.add(new Slot(l.removeLast().start, l2.removeFirst().end));} l.addAll(l2);});
This uses the more appropriate list implementation LinkedList to simplify removing and accessing the last element of the list when merging Slots.
List<List<Slot>> tests = Arrays.asList(
Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7), new Slot(8, 10), new Slot(10, 11), new Slot(11, 13)),
Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7), new Slot(8, 10), new Slot(10, 11), new Slot(12, 13)),
Arrays.asList(new Slot(3, 5), new Slot(5, 7)),
Collections.emptyList());
for (List<Slot> slots : tests) {
List<Slot> condensed = slots.stream().collect(LinkedList::new,
(l, s) -> l.add(l.isEmpty() || l.getLast().end != s.start ?
s : new Slot(l.removeLast().start, s.end)),
(l, l2) -> {if (!l.isEmpty() && !l2.isEmpty() && l.getLast().end == l2.getFirst().start) {
l.add(new Slot(l.removeLast().start, l2.removeFirst().end));} l.addAll(l2);});
System.out.println(condensed);
}
Output:
[[3, 7], [8, 13]]
[[3, 7], [8, 11], [12, 13]]
[[3, 7]]
[]
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32771415/java-8-stream-mixing-two-elements