Does a join of co-partitioned RDDs cause a shuffle in Apache Spark?

问题

Will rdd1.join(rdd2) cause a shuffle to happen if rdd1 and rdd2 have the same partitioner?

回答1:

No. If two RDDs have the same partitioner, the join will not cause a shuffle. You can see this in CoGroupedRDD.scala:

override def getDependencies: Seq[Dependency[_]] = {
  rdds.map { rdd: RDD[_ <: Product2[K, _]] =>
    if (rdd.partitioner == Some(part)) {
      logDebug("Adding one-to-one dependency with " + rdd)
      new OneToOneDependency(rdd)
    } else {
      logDebug("Adding shuffle dependency with " + rdd)
      new ShuffleDependency[K, Any, CoGroupCombiner](rdd, part, serializer)
    }
  }
}

Note however, that the lack of a shuffle does not mean that no data will have to be moved between nodes. It's possible for two RDDs to have the same partitioner (be co-partitioned) yet have the corresponding partitions located on different nodes (not be co-located).

This situation is still better than doing a shuffle, but it's something to keep in mind. Co-location can improve performance, but is hard to guarantee.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28395376/does-a-join-of-co-partitioned-rdds-cause-a-shuffle-in-apache-spark