Nullable create via reflection with HasValue = false, given a parameter of type `Type` only

问题

Given a type parameter which is a Nullable<>, how can I create an instance of that type which has HasValue = false?

In other words, complete this code:

//type is guaranteed to implement Nullable<>
public static object Create(Type type)
{
    //Instantiate a Nullable<T> with reflection whose HasValue = false, and return it
}

My attempt, which doesn't work (it throws a NullReferenceException) as there's no default constructor:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    Console.WriteLine(Create(typeof(Nullable<int>)));

    Console.ReadLine();
}

//type is guaranteed to be implement from Nullable<>
public static object Create(Type type)
{
    //Instantatie a Nullable<T> with reflection whose HasValue = false, and return it
    return type.GetConstructor(new Type[0]).Invoke(new object[0]);
}

回答1:

Given a type parameter which is a Nullable<>, how can I create an instance of that type which has HasValue = false?

If you want a method with a signature of object, you just return null:

//type is guaranteed to be implement from Nullable<>
public static object Create(Type type)
{
    return null;
}

That will always be the boxed representation of any nullable type value where HasValue is null. In other words, the method is pointless... you might as well just use the null literal:

var i = (int?) null;

Of course, if type isn't guaranteed to be nullable value type, you might want to conditionalize the code... but it's important to understand that there's no such thing as an object representation of a Nullable<T> value. Even for non-null values, the boxed representation is the boxed representation of the non-nullable type:

int? x = 5;
object y = x; // Boxing
Console.WriteLine(y.GetType()); // System.Int32; nullability has vanished

回答2:

Highly dangerous (and not recommended for non-testing purposes) is to use SharpUtils' method UnsafeTools.Box<T>(T? nullable). It bypasses the normal boxing of nullable types, which boxes their value or returns null, and instead creates an actual instance of Nullable<T>. Note that working with such an instance can be extremely buggy.

public static object Create<T>() where T : struct //T must be a normal struct, not nullable
{
    return UnsafeTools.Box(default(T?));
}

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29627013/nullable-create-via-reflection-with-hasvalue-false-given-a-parameter-of-type

标签

reflection

nullable