问题
ISSUE: Getting duplicate items, i.e more threads are getting created than the array size... Hi Folks, I am creating thread in the loop for each element of array. The real use is that the of sending a batch of messages using amazon ses. the messages are stored in the messageamazonRequestBatch and the loop runs through the batch and sends the messages.
HERE IS THE CODE:
Thread thrdSendEmail;
try
{
string amazonMessageID = string.Empty;
List<Thread> lstThread = new List<Thread>();
foreach (int n in arrMessageid)
{
thrdSendEmail = new Thread(() =>
{
try
{
amazonMessageID = SendSimpleEmail_Part2(messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n).req);
messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n).msg.AmazonMessageID = amazonMessageID;
logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + n , true);
//logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + n + ",\t" + messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n).msg.QueueMessageId + ",\t" + amazonMessageID, true);
}
catch (Exception ex) { logManager_RunSummary.LogMessage(ex.Message, true); }
});
thrdSendEmail.Name = n.ToString();
lstThread.Add(thrdSendEmail);
thrdSendEmail.Start();
//logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + n, true);
}
foreach (Thread t in lstThread)
{
t.Join();
//logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + t.Name, true);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logManager_RunSummary.LogMessage(ex.Message, true);
}
I have also tried parallel.foreach and asynch and await options... they also give the duplicates. I know that the lock will solve the problem but in my case the lock degrades the performance by a factor of 10.. that is my performance drops 10 times... coz putting the sendemail login in lock is blocking untill i get a return amazonmessageid from amazon...
Any help on this will be greatly appreciated. I am not a novice programmer but new to threading...
回答1:
Your lambda expression is capturing the loop variable n
, so when your lambda executes, the value of n
has already changed; you need to copy n
to a local variable inside the loop. (assuming you're using C# 4 or earlier; C# 5 fixed that problem).
Another issue is that all your threads use the same amazonMessageID
variable; you should declare it inside the lambda expression instead.
foreach (int n in arrMessageid)
{
int n2 = n;
thrdSendEmail = new Thread(() =>
{
try
{
string amazonMessageID = SendSimpleEmail_Part2(messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n2).req);
messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n2).msg.AmazonMessageID = amazonMessageID;
logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + n2 , true);
//logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + n2 + ",\t" + messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n2).msg.QueueMessageId + ",\t" + amazonMessageID, true);
}
catch (Exception ex) { logManager_RunSummary.LogMessage(ex.Message, true); }
});
...
回答2:
I don't like that your threads share the same variables (I mean n
and amazonMessageID
), it is not thread safe and it may cause your problem. Moreover I suggest you to use Parallel.ForEach method, it can make your code easy. It could look like this:
try
{
Parallel.ForEach(arrMessageid.Distinct(),
n =>
{
try
{
var amazonMessageID = SendSimpleEmail_Part2(messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n).req);
messageAmazonRequestBatch.ElementAt(n).msg.AmazonMessageID = amazonMessageID;
logManager_MessageLogwithAmazonmsgID.LogMessage(",\t" + n , true);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logManager_RunSummary.LogMessage(ex.Message, true);
}
}
);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
logManager_RunSummary.LogMessage(ex.Message, true);
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21418263/creating-manual-threads-but-getting-duplicate-threads