Why is the bound `T: 'a` required in order to store a reference `&'a T`?

问题

Given this code:

struct RefWrapper<'a, T> {
    r: &'a T,
}

... the compiler complains:

error: the parameter type T may not live long enough

consider adding an explicit lifetime bound T: 'a so that the reference type &'a T does not outlive the data it points at.

I've seen this error multiple times already and so far I just listened to the compiler and everything worked out fine. However, thinking more about it, I don't understand why I have to write T: 'a.

As far as I understand, it is already impossible to get such a reference. Having &'a T implies that there is an object of type T that lives for at least 'a. But we can't store any references in said object which point to data having a shorter lifetime than 'a. This would already result in a compiler error.

In that sense it is already impossible to get a &'a T where T does not outlive 'a. Thus the additional annotation (T: 'a) shouldn't be necessary.

Am I right? Am I wrong and if yes: how could I break code, if T: 'a would not be required?

---

Links:

• RFC introducing the syntax
• Another maybe related RFC

回答1:

This is part of the well-formedness rules. The type &'a T is only well-formed if T: 'a (“T outlives 'a”; it is required because we have a reference which we can access during the scope 'a; the pointed-to value in T needs to be valid for at least that scope, too).

struct RefWrapper<'a, T> is a generic type and it says you can input a lifetime 'x and a type U and get a RefWrapper<'x, U> type back. However, this type is not necessarily well-formed or even implemented unless the requirement T: 'a is respected.

This requirement comes from an implementation detail; it's not necessarily so that T and 'a are used together like &'a T in the struct's internals. The well formedness requirement needs to be promoted to the public interface of the RefWrapper struct, so that the requirements of forming a RefWrapper<'_, _> type are public, even if the internal implementation is not.

(There are other places where the same requirement T: 'a comes back but is implict:

pub fn foo<'a, T>(x: &'a T) { }

we spot a difference: here the type &'a T is part of the public api, too.)

回答2:

Congratulations, you were right! As of Rust 1.31, thanks to RFC 2093, Infer T: 'x outlives requirements on structs, the requirement on the user to type out this restriction has been removed:

Remove the need for explicit T: 'x annotations on structs. We will infer their presence based on the fields of the struct. In short, if the struct contains a reference, directly or indirectly, to T with lifetime 'x, then we will infer that T: 'x is a requirement

Basically, there wasn't a case where this wasn't required, so there wasn't much value in forcing the programmer to write it out.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41794800/why-is-the-bound-t-a-required-in-order-to-store-a-reference-a-t