QuickSort on Doubly Linked List

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-01 23:21:50

Just from a quick skim, it seems that your list is not only doubly linked, but also is connected at the ends (so it's more like a Ring than like a list). In other words, if I were to iterate over your list (containing elements A, B, C, D), it wouldn't be:

A -> B -> C -> D -> stop

Instead it would be

A -> B -> C -> D -> A -> B -> C -> D -> A -> B ..... etc.

I suspect that could be why you are having an infinite loop.

I would create a reference to the last element of your list in your DoublyLinkedList class (example: in.last), use that for getting the last element, and have the first and last elements link to either null or some sort of NullListElement extends ListElement


If you must keep it as a ring, I will still add a reference to the last element of your list, so that you can say something like:

if(walker == in.last) break; // stop
Node partition(Node start, Node end){
    Node l = start;
    Node h = end.previous;
    Node pivot = end;

    if(end!=null && end.next!=start){ //Whenever deal with end.next, check null check
        while(h!=null && h.next!=l){//Whenever deal with end.next, check null check
            System.out.println("gumi");
            if(l.data<pivot.data)
                l=l.next;
            else if(h.data>pivot.data)
                h=h.previous;
            else{
                int temp = l.data;
                l.data = h.data;
                h.data = temp;
            }   
        }   
        int temp = pivot.data;
        pivot.data = l.data;
        l.data = temp;
    }
    return l;

}
void quicksort(Node start, Node end){
     System.out.println("jose");
   if(end!=null && end.next!=start ){ //Whenever deal with end.next, check null check , end should not be less than start: so the condition end.next!=start 
       System.out.println("Quixk");
       Node pivot = partition(start,end);
       quicksort(start, pivot.previous);
       quicksort(pivot.next, end);
   }

}
lanoxx

Here is an implementation for QuickSort using a DoublyLinkedList class which contains a reference to the first (in.first) ListElement, a list element contains a key and prev and next references:

public DoublyLinkedList quicksort(DoublyLinkedList in, int numOfElements) {
    in.first = partition(in.first, in.first.prev);
    return in;
}

private ListElement partition(ListElement first, ListElement pivotElement) {
    ListElement left = first;
    ListElement right = pivotElement;

    while (left != pivotElement) {
        if (left.getKey() > pivotElement.getKey()) {
            ListElement next = left.next;
            if (left == first)
                first = next;
            //Remove currentLeft
            left.prev.next = left.next;
            left.next.prev = left.prev;

            //Connect with element after currentRight
            left.next = right.next;
            right.next.prev = left;

            //Connect with pivotElement
            left.prev = right;
            right.next = left;

            right = left; //Switch right with left, since we just swapped their positions
            left = next;  //Assign left to the next object (from the left part)
        } else {
            left = left.next;
        }
    }
    if (first != pivotElement.prev && first != pivotElement)
        first = partition(first, pivotElement.prev);
    if (pivotElement != right)
        partition(pivotElement.next, right);
    return first;
}

At the time of this writing, when I run this on my desktop computer with a very recent Haswel CPU I get the following results:

Quicksort:
1.000.000 Items: 696ms
8.300.000 Items: 8131ms

Note that this is much slower than my MergeSort implementation for the same data structure, for which I get the following timings on the same computer with the same input:

Mergesort:
1.000.000 Items: 466ms
8.300.000 Items: 5144ms

Note the timings are specific to my hardware and you might get different results.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!