zeromq

ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ or ZeroMQ or [closed]

由 北慕城南 提交于 2019-11-26 02:17:42
We'd be interested to hear any experiences with the pros and cons of ActiveMQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ. Information about any other interesting message queues is also welcome. Julien Edit: My initial answer had a strong focus on AMQP. I decided to rewrite it to offer a wider view on the topic. These 3 messaging technologies have different approaches on building distributed systems : RabbitMQ is one of the leading implementation of the AMQP protocol (along with Apache Qpid). Therefore, it implements a broker architecture, meaning that messages are queued on a central node before being sent to

ActiveMQ or RabbitMQ or ZeroMQ or [closed]

由 半腔热情 提交于 2019-11-26 01:47:55
问题 We\'d be interested to hear any experiences with the pros and cons of ActiveMQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ. Information about any other interesting message queues is also welcome. 回答1: Edit: My initial answer had a strong focus on AMQP. I decided to rewrite it to offer a wider view on the topic. These 3 messaging technologies have different approaches on building distributed systems : RabbitMQ is one of the leading implementation of the AMQP protocol (along with Apache Qpid). Therefore, it

How to control the source IP address of a ZeroMQ packet on a machine with multiple IPs?

由 坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-11-26 00:08:02
问题 The Python standard library\'s socket.create_connection()method has a source address option, for controlling which source IP a connection uses. How do I do the same thing with a Python ZeroMQ socket, given a machine that has multiple addresses? In this case, I\'ve been using Linux\'s iproute2 ip addr add to create the addresses and the ZeroMQ PUB/SUB socket-archetypes. 回答1: Well, ZeroMQ is a bit tricky to read as a socket -"counterparty" ( it's not ) Why? Classical socket is a free-to-harness

消息中间件的技术选型心得－RabbitMQ、ActiveMQ和ZeroMQ

由 喜欢而已 提交于 2019-11-25 23:24:19
消息中间件的技术选型心得－RabbitMQ、ActiveMQ和ZeroMQ 作者：chszs，转载需注明。博客主页：http://blog.csdn.net/chszs RabbitMQ、ActiveMQ和ZeroMQ都是极好的消息中间件，但是我们在项目中该选择哪个更适合呢？很多开发者面临这个烦恼。下面我会对这三个消息中间件做一个比较，看了后你们就心中有数了。 RabbitMQ是AMQP协议领先的一个实现，它实现了代理(Broker)架构，意味着消息在发送到客户端之前可以在中央节点上排队。此特性使得RabbitMQ易于使用和部署，适宜于很多场景如路由、负载均衡或消息持久化等，用消息队列只需几行代码即可搞定。但是，这使得它的可扩展性差，速度较慢，因为中央节点增加了延迟，消息封装后也比较大。 ZeroMQ是一个非常轻量级的消息系统，专门为高吞吐量/低延迟的场景开发，在金融界的应用中经常可以发现它。与RabbitMQ相比，ZeroMQ支持许多高级消息场景，但是你必须实现ZeroMQ框架中的各个块（比如Socket或Device等）。ZeroMQ非常灵活，但是你必须学习它的80页的手册（如果你要写一个分布式系统，一定要阅读它）。 ActiveMQ居于两者之间，类似于ZemoMQ，它可以部署于代理模式和P2P模式。类似于RabbitMQ，它易于实现高级场景，而且只需付出低消耗
订阅 zeromq