xunit

I have a ASP.NET Core MVC API with controllers that need to be unit tested. Controller: using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization; using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc; using System.Threading.Tasks; namespace TransitApi.Api.Controllers { [Route("api/foo")] public class FooController : Controller { private IFooRepository FooRepository { get; } public FooController(IFooRepository fooRepository) { FooRepository = fooRepository; } [HttpGet] [Authorize("scopes:getfoos")] public async Task<IActionResult> GetAsync() { var foos = await FooRepository.GetAsync(); return Json(foos); } } } It is essential that I

The latest xunit framework does not allow test runners in library code when compiled with .Net Core framework (this is allowed for normal Visual Studio code). The solution is to create a separate testing project to run your test cases. The problem that I am having is that some methods that I want to test are 'private' methods. How can I call those methods from my test project without making their scope 'public'? The more general question is: How do you test private methods when the public method that uses the private method can not be used? (because of its interactive nature - that is, it has

I 'm writing test cases for the first time in visual studio c# i have a method that returns a list of objects and i want to compare it with another list of objects by using the Assert.AreEqual() method. I tried doing this but the assertion fails even if the two objects are identical. I wanted to know if this method, the two parameters are comparing references or the content of the object, Do I have to overload the == operator to make this work? anouar.bagari If you are using NUnit this is what the documentation says Starting with version 2.2, special provision is also made for comparing single

I'm expanding my Ruby understanding by coding an equivalent of Kent Beck's xUnit in Ruby. Python (which Kent writes in) has an assert() method in the language which is used extensively. Ruby does not. I think it should be easy to add this but is Kernel the right place to put it? BTW, I know of the existence of the various Unit frameworks in Ruby - this is an exercise to learn the Ruby idioms, rather than to "get something done". Julik No it's not a best practice. The best analogy to assert() in Ruby is just raising raise "This is wrong" unless expr and you can implement your own exceptions if

I'm porting a small library that I have on NuGet to .NET Core. I've created .NET Standard 1.6 class libraries for the main project and the tests, and copied over the code. I changed the unit tests to use XUnit attributes and asserts rather than NUnit. Other than that I pretty much followed the instructions in the documentation , thus I added the following NuGet packages: Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk xunit xunit.runner.visualstudio Alas, (1) Test Explorer does not find my unit tests, and (2) when I run dotnet test , I get the following: Starting test execution, please wait... Could not find testhost

I am trying to test the following filter: using Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc; using Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Filters; namespace Hello { public class ValidationFilter : ActionFilterAttribute { public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) { if (!filterContext.ModelState.IsValid) { filterContext.Result = new BadRequestObjectResult(filterContext.ModelState); } } } } I am trying to mock the ActionFilterAttribute using Moq. I am using Mvc 6.0.0-rc1 My first try: var context = new ActionExecutingContext( new ActionContext(Mock.Of<HttpContext>(), new RouteData(), new