wait

Question I want to start the Firefox web browser as process to visit a specific website, then wait until it is closed. A special situation is that the browser may already be open and running, as the user may have visited some website already. In that case, the browser would probably open a new tab in an existing window and the newly launched process will be terminated immediately. This should not confuse my waiting process: Either, I want a new browser window (if that can somehow be enforced, maybe via command line arguments) and wait until that is closed, or keep the existing browser window

Question I want to start the Firefox web browser as process to visit a specific website, then wait until it is closed. A special situation is that the browser may already be open and running, as the user may have visited some website already. In that case, the browser would probably open a new tab in an existing window and the newly launched process will be terminated immediately. This should not confuse my waiting process: Either, I want a new browser window (if that can somehow be enforced, maybe via command line arguments) and wait until that is closed, or keep the existing browser window

I'm new to using wait() and notify() in Java and I'm getting an IllegalMonitorStateException. Main Code public class ThreadTest { private static Integer state = 0; public static void main(String[] args) { synchronized(state) { System.out.println("Starting thread"); Thread t = new Thread(new AnotherTest()); t.start(); synchronized(state) { state = 0; while(state == 0) { try { state.wait(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } } System.out.println("State is: " + state); } } } public static class AnotherTest implements Runnable {

This question already has an answer here: Launch Firefox and Wait until it is Closed 1 answer Question I want to start the Chrome web browser as process to visit a specific website, then wait until it is closed. A special situation is that the browser may already be open and running, as the user may have visited some website already. In that case, the browser would probably open a new tab in an existing window and the newly launched process will be terminated immediately. This should not confuse my waiting process: Either, I want a new browser window (if that can somehow be enforced, maybe via

Is there any way to use the wait() system call with a timeout, besides using a busy-waiting or busy-sleeping loop? I've got a parent process that fork s itself and exec s a child executable. It then waits for the child to finish, grabs its output by whatever means appropriate, and and performs further processing. If the process does not finish within a certain period of time, it assumes that its execution timed out, and does something else. Unfortunately, this timeout detection is necessary given the nature of the problem. There's not a wait call that takes a timeout. What you can do instead

I want to repeatedly execute a program in a loop. Sometimes, the program crashes, so I want to kill it so the next iteration can correctly start. I determine this via timeout. I have the timeout working but cannot get the Exit Code of the program, which I also need to determine its result. Before, I did not wait with timeout, but just used -wait in Start-Process, but this made the script hang if the started program crashed. With this setup I could correctly get the exit code though. I am executing from ISE. for ($i=0; $i -le $max_iterations; $i++) { $proc = Start-Process -filePath

I am new to selenium webdriver and am testing one application. In my application, I have to test about linking Facebook Account. Whenever I click on link the pop up will be displayed where I have to enter credentials. I am able to link sometimes and sometimes the test fails. I know the reason because it takes time to load pop up window and next command is executed so it is not able to find the element. I have used Thread.Sleep but I want to use implicit wait or explicit wait which is always a good practice rather than Thread.Sleep. How to use implicit wait and where to use that command exactly