version-control

问题 I was just wondering how I could automatically increment the build (and version?) of my files using Visual Studio (2005). If I look up the properties of say C:\Windows\notepad.exe , the Version tab gives "File version: 5.1.2600.2180". I would like to get these cool numbers in the version of my dll's too, not version 1.0.0.0, which let's face it is a bit dull. I tried a few things, but it doesn't seem to be out-of-box functionality, or maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place (as usual). I

问题 I was just wondering how I could automatically increment the build (and version?) of my files using Visual Studio (2005). If I look up the properties of say C:\Windows\notepad.exe , the Version tab gives "File version: 5.1.2600.2180". I would like to get these cool numbers in the version of my dll's too, not version 1.0.0.0, which let's face it is a bit dull. I tried a few things, but it doesn't seem to be out-of-box functionality, or maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place (as usual). I

问题 I was just wondering how I could automatically increment the build (and version?) of my files using Visual Studio (2005). If I look up the properties of say C:\Windows\notepad.exe , the Version tab gives "File version: 5.1.2600.2180". I would like to get these cool numbers in the version of my dll's too, not version 1.0.0.0, which let's face it is a bit dull. I tried a few things, but it doesn't seem to be out-of-box functionality, or maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place (as usual). I

问题 Want to improve this post? Provide detailed answers to this question, including citations and an explanation of why your answer is correct. Answers without enough detail may be edited or deleted. I mistakenly added files to Git using the command: git add myfile.txt I have not yet run git commit . Is there a way to undo this, so these files won't be included in the commit? 回答1: You can undo git add before commit with git reset <file> which will remove it from the current index (the "about to

问题 I don't want to rename a remote branch, as described in Rename master branch for both local and remote Git repositories . How can I rename a local branch which hasn't been pushed to a remote branch? In case you need to rename remote branch as well: How do I rename both a Git local and remote branch name 回答1: If you want to rename a branch while pointed to any branch, do: git branch -m <oldname> <newname> If you want to rename the current branch, you can do: git branch -m <newname> A way to

问题 I've been using Git now for a couple of months on a project with one other developer. I have several years of experience with SVN, so I guess I bring a lot of baggage to the relationship. I have heard that Git is excellent for branching and merging, and so far, I just don't see it. Sure, branching is dead simple, but when I try to merge, everything goes all to hell. Now, I'm used to that from SVN, but it seems to me that I just traded one sub-par versioning system for another. My partner

问题 I've been using Git now for a couple of months on a project with one other developer. I have several years of experience with SVN, so I guess I bring a lot of baggage to the relationship. I have heard that Git is excellent for branching and merging, and so far, I just don't see it. Sure, branching is dead simple, but when I try to merge, everything goes all to hell. Now, I'm used to that from SVN, but it seems to me that I just traded one sub-par versioning system for another. My partner

问题 I've been using Git now for a couple of months on a project with one other developer. I have several years of experience with SVN, so I guess I bring a lot of baggage to the relationship. I have heard that Git is excellent for branching and merging, and so far, I just don't see it. Sure, branching is dead simple, but when I try to merge, everything goes all to hell. Now, I'm used to that from SVN, but it seems to me that I just traded one sub-par versioning system for another. My partner

问题 I have worked a few places which haven’t used source control. They seemed to get into the habit of putting comments around code they changed explaining the change so that things could be reverted. I have found that this makes the code very difficult to read, and have been fairly adamant that such comments are not needed after introducing source control as the revision history will let you match up tickets with changes. However now, I am not so sure, I think it may be good to document major

问题 I'm developing in Visual Studio 2005, using TFS as the source control. Whenever I haven't been working on the solution for a while, I always do a recursive Get Latest in Solution Explorer. However, this doesn't always seem to work. If I know I don't have the latest version of a file, even right-clicking this (in Solution Explorer), choosing Get Specific Version and ticking the "Force get" box doesn't work. I seem to need to open up the TFS Source Control window, and there force a Get of the