version-control

Git allows for branch change with unstaged changes

梦想的初衷 提交于 2019-12-27 13:38:14
问题 Git is allowing me to change branches when I have changes not staged for commit (modified files). Is there a configuration for this somewhere? Edit: At first I thought this was a configuration that I needed to set to disallow changing between branches if there are modified unstaged files. But by Emily's comment, it appears that you're prompted if the files differ between branches, and not prompted otherwise. 回答1: How it decides A quick experiment shows the following. Suppose you're on branch

Committing Machine Specific Configuration Files

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-12-27 09:07:08
问题 A common scenario when I develop is that the codebase will have several config files which require machine specific settings. These files will be checked into Git and other developers will always accidentally check them back in and break someone else's configuration. A simple solution to this would be to just not check them in to Git, or even to additionally add a .gitignore entry for them. However, I find that it is much more elegant to have some sensible defaults in the file which the

Committing Machine Specific Configuration Files

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-27 09:06:26
问题 A common scenario when I develop is that the codebase will have several config files which require machine specific settings. These files will be checked into Git and other developers will always accidentally check them back in and break someone else's configuration. A simple solution to this would be to just not check them in to Git, or even to additionally add a .gitignore entry for them. However, I find that it is much more elegant to have some sensible defaults in the file which the

Committing Machine Specific Configuration Files

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-27 09:06:23
问题 A common scenario when I develop is that the codebase will have several config files which require machine specific settings. These files will be checked into Git and other developers will always accidentally check them back in and break someone else's configuration. A simple solution to this would be to just not check them in to Git, or even to additionally add a .gitignore entry for them. However, I find that it is much more elegant to have some sensible defaults in the file which the

Committing Machine Specific Configuration Files

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-12-27 09:06:21
问题 A common scenario when I develop is that the codebase will have several config files which require machine specific settings. These files will be checked into Git and other developers will always accidentally check them back in and break someone else's configuration. A simple solution to this would be to just not check them in to Git, or even to additionally add a .gitignore entry for them. However, I find that it is much more elegant to have some sensible defaults in the file which the

Best way to maintain different versions of codebase for different hardware setups with GitHub

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-12-25 17:45:11
问题 I'm new to GitHub, and one of the software projects my group is working on interfaces with custom hardware setups. It is necessary to have a different version of the codebase for each hardware setup, but I'm a bit unsure of the best way to do this with GitHub. I could create a branch for each different setup, but that sort of implies that they will eventually be merged back into the master. Has anybody else come across this before, or know of the best way to handle this? 回答1: I don't think

How to organise projects in Git for two projects with shared modules?

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-12-25 17:41:32
问题 I am now faced with a challenge of organising two projects' code in Git. There are two software A and B, one could say that B is the same as A, only that it has some additional modules (more features). So the problem now is, I have two projects, but I cannot simply separate them into two repositories since they share 4/5 of the same files. A and B are compiled to be two separate software releases, so how can I organise them such that it makes sense? I have thought about having 2 repositories,

Can I create an ASP.NET MVC 2 project with multiple areas without referencing each Child in the parent area?

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-12-25 16:43:35
问题 This is a follow-up question to my original query: How can I use multiple projects to separate a large ASP.NET MVC site into departments? Now that I have this working, is there a way to still have multiple project but not have to reference each child area from the parent project? Ideally I'd like to be able to have multiple, separate and distinct projects that only come together on the production/test machines. I should be able to build and test each "area" separately. 回答1: Not in MVC 2 Beta.

Git - fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' & notice: HEAD points to unborn branch (master)

半世苍凉 提交于 2019-12-25 09:38:01
问题 I am a newbie to all this and currently taking a class to learn git. However, I was in the process of practicing branching and merging. I had created a new branch and it was switched but my computer started to have issues, which cause me to shut it down and restart. When I return to my work, I returned to this: >git status On branch master Initial commit Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what .gitconfig AppData/ Contacts/ Creative Cloud Files/ Desktop/ Documents/

Git - fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' & notice: HEAD points to unborn branch (master)

守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-25 09:37:18
问题 I am a newbie to all this and currently taking a class to learn git. However, I was in the process of practicing branching and merging. I had created a new branch and it was switched but my computer started to have issues, which cause me to shut it down and restart. When I return to my work, I returned to this: >git status On branch master Initial commit Untracked files: (use "git add <file>..." to include in what .gitconfig AppData/ Contacts/ Creative Cloud Files/ Desktop/ Documents/