traits

Cake pattern with overriding abstract type don't work with Upper Type Bounds

帅比萌擦擦* 提交于 2019-11-27 05:09:29
I want to override abstract type in trait with <: and not with = (like answer here Scala Upper Bounds : value is not a member of type parameter ). I want to use cake pattern, but this doesn't work, i don't understand why ? trait A { def ping = println("ping") } trait Cake { type T } trait S { this: Cake => type T = A def t: T t.ping } OK, this example run, but in my real use case i want to override type with <: and not with = .It seems impossible to access the t function, why ? trait S { this: Cake => type T <: A def t: T t.ping } return an error value ping is not a member of S.this.T It's a

Difference between Abstract Class and Trait [duplicate]

戏子无情 提交于 2019-11-27 05:00:03
问题 Possible Duplicate: Scala traits vs abstract classes What is the conceptual difference between abstract classes and traits? 回答1: A class can only extend one superclass, and thus, only one abstract class. If you want to compose several classes the Scala way is to use mixin class composition: you combine an (optional) superclass, your own member definitions and one or more traits. A trait is restricted in comparison to classes in that it cannot have constructor parameters (compare the scala

Automatically implement traits of enclosed type for Rust newtypes (tuple structs with one field)

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-11-27 04:49:37
In Rust, tuple structs with only one field can be created like the following: struct Centimeters(i32); I want to do basic arithmetic with Centimeters without extracting their "inner" values every time with pattern matching, and without implementing the Add , Sub , ... traits and overloading operators. What I want to do is: let a = Centimeters(100); let b = Centimeters(200); assert_eq!(a + a, b); huon is there a way to do it without extracting their "inner" values every time with pattern matching, and without implementing the Add, Sub, ... traits and overloading operators? No, the only way is

Why is the Copy trait needed for default (struct valued) array initialization?

故事扮演 提交于 2019-11-27 04:38:29
问题 When I define a struct like this, I can pass it to a function by value without adding anything specific: #[derive(Debug)] struct MyType { member: u16, } fn my_function(param: MyType) { println!("param.member: {}", param.member); } When I want to create an array of MyType instances with a default value fn main() { let array = [MyType { member: 1234 }; 100]; println!("array[42].member: ", array[42].member); } The Rust compiler tells me: error[E0277]: the trait bound `MyType: std::marker::Copy`

Extend Traits with Classes in PHP?

末鹿安然 提交于 2019-11-27 04:29:21
问题 Why we are not allowed to extend Traits with Classes in PHP? For example: Trait T { } Class C use T {} /* or */ Class C extends T {} Is there any potential conflict for such syntax? I do not think so. 回答1: The PHP manual states thus: Traits is a mechanism for code reuse in single inheritance languages such as PHP. A Trait is intended to reduce some limitations of single inheritance by enabling a developer to reuse sets of methods freely in several independent classes living in different class

Why is the `Sized` bound necessary in this trait?

两盒软妹~` 提交于 2019-11-27 04:25:25
问题 I have a trait with two associated functions: trait WithConstructor: Sized { fn new_with_param(param: usize) -> Self; fn new() -> Self { Self::new_with_param(0) } } Why does the default implementation of the second method ( new() ) force me to put the Sized bound on the type? I think it's because of the stack pointer manipulation, but I'm not sure. If the compiler needs to know the size to allocate memory on the stack, why does the following example not require Sized for T ? struct

Linearization order in Scala

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-11-27 03:15:49
I have difficulties in understanding the linearization order in Scala when working with traits: class A { def foo() = "A" } trait B extends A { override def foo() = "B" + super.foo() } trait C extends B { override def foo() = "C" + super.foo() } trait D extends A { override def foo() = "D" + super.foo() } object LinearizationPlayground { def main(args: Array[String]) { var d = new A with D with C with B; println(d.foo) // CBDA???? } } It prints CBDA but I can't figure out why. How is the order of the traits determined? Thx An intuitive way to reason about linearisation is to refer to the

What's the difference between `<T: Trait>` and `where T: Trait`?

余生长醉 提交于 2019-11-27 02:55:46
问题 In the docs for the Send trait, I see both impl<T> Send for LinkedList<T> where T: Send, and impl<T: Send> Send for LinkedList<T> What is the difference between these two syntaxes, and how would it impact my code if I was writing impl declarations for my own trait? 回答1: Trait bounds defined inside a where clause are a superset of the trait bounds declared inline. The inline style existed before the where clause; the where clause was introduced in RFC 135: Add where clauses, which provide a

Traits in PHP – any real world examples/best practices? [closed]

落花浮王杯 提交于 2019-11-27 02:26:03
Traits have been one of the biggest additions for PHP 5.4. I know the syntax and understand the idea behind traits, like horizontal code re-use for common stuff like logging, security, caching etc. However, I still don't know how I would make use of traits in my projects. Are there any open source projects that already use traits? Any good articles/reading material on how to structure architectures using traits? My personal opinion is that there is actually very little application for traits when writing clean code. Instead of using traits to hack code into a class it is better to pass in the

Scala client composition with Traits vs implementing an abstract class

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-11-27 01:15:26
问题 I have read that with Scala, it is generally advised to use Traits instead of Abstract classes to extend a base class. Is the following a good design pattern and layout? Is this how Traits were intended to replace Abstract? client class (with def function1) trait1 class (overrides function1) trait2 class (overrides function1) specificClient1 extends client with trait1 specificClient2 extends client with trait2 回答1: I don't know what your source is for the claim that you should prefer traits