trace

I have written an instrument-er in C++ to log entry and exit functions by hooking on enter and exit calls. It is working as supposed to with a legacy code base. However on hooking with a project that I downloaded from git, function addresses that I save in an extern variable in the subject code, they are coming out different in the profiler library. That is messing up the function pointer comparison between hooked and saved functions. Function address in subject code main file, breakpoint is inside the _penter hook function in the profiler code currently The same entry is showing a different

It occurs pretty often that I start debugging a class by logging every function call to console and looking for differences in the bugged cases. Is there some attribute that I can apply to a class to enable such a tracing? It's pretty exhausting to have to enter these Console.WriteLine("classname: methodname") to every method and to remove them afterwards (removing can be done by conditional compilation, but it is not very nice to look at the code when you have all this redundance) There was an add-on tool someone mentioned to me, using Attributes. Let's see if I can find it. I think it was

I have this code(iterative deepening to find shortest path) : arc(a, g). arc(a, b). arc(b, g). path(X, Z, Path) :- length(Path, _), path_r(X, Z, Path). path_r(Z, Z, []). path_r(X, Z, [X|Path]) :- arc(X, Y), path(Y, Z, Path). And when I trace it, in one of the traces it gives me : 2 2 Redo: length([],0) ? What's happening here? Also, what is 2 2 in the left of the line? The rest of the tracing: 1 1 Call: path(a,g,_23) ? 2 2 Call: length(_23,_55) ? 2 2 Exit: length([],0) ? 3 2 Call: path_r(a,g,[]) ? 3 2 Fail: path_r(a,g,[]) ? 2 2 Redo: length([],0) ? 2 2 Exit: length([_80],1) ? 3 2 Call: path_r

For testing purposes I'm planning to put together a little app that will listen for a particular event coming from an application and interact with it at that point. Given that we're at a point in the testing process where changing the application code is out of the question, the ideal from my point of view would be to listen to the debugging trace from the application, a little like debugview does, and respond to that. Can anyone offer guidance on how best to go about this? glenatron The way I found to do it used the Mdbg tools from Microsoft to give me access from the runtime to the core

I’m trying to set up .NET tracing. I’m able to get basic tracing to work via System.Diagnostics.Trace, but for complicated reasons I have to activate tracing via System.Diagnostics.TraceSource objects (the new way of doing it, since .NET 2.0) rather than using System.Diagnostics.Trace. I've tried everything but it just doesn't want to work using TraceSource. I am performing the tracing in an ASP.NET code-behind (aspx.cs) Here are some related URLs: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ty48b824.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/64yxa344.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library

What's the difference between Trace.Write Writes information about the trace to the trace listeners and Trace.TraceInformation ? Writes an informational message to the trace listeners Unfortunately the API is muddled here and the specific overloads change the behavior. The method level documentation does not describe the methods well and looking at the (decompiled) source is beneficial in answering this question. Trace.Write/WriteLine(string) are the abstract methods that implementations override to actually "write" to the base streams and any data shoved in will be accepted, regardless of any

I'm using python's trace module to trace some code. When I trace code this way, I can get one of the following two results: Call : tracer = trace.Trace(count=False, trace=True, ignoredirs=[sys.prefix, sys.exec_prefix]) r = tracer.run('run()') tracer.results().write_results(show_missing=True) Result : <filename>(<line number>): <line of code> Call [ citation ]: tracer = trace.Trace(count=False, trace=True, ignoredirs=[sys.prefix, sys.exec_prefix], countfuncs=True) r = tracer.run('run()') tracer.results().write_results(show_missing=True) Result : filename:<filepath>, modulename:<module name>,