toolbar

I have a WPF window that has a ToolBar . I have a collection of objects in my VM that I'm binding to. They appear as buttons but they always get pushed to the expanded drop down part of the ToolBar . How do I make those buttons appear in the standard part of the ToolBar ? I have the following XAML: <ToolBarTray Grid.Row="1"> <ToolBar ItemsSource="{Binding Path=MyList}" > <ToolBar.ItemTemplate> <DataTemplate > <Button ToolTip="{Binding ButtonName}" Command="{Binding Path=ButtonCommand}" > <Button.Content> <Image Width="32" Height="32" Source="{Binding ImageSource}"/> </Button.Content> </Button>

If I place a Button within a ToolBar in WPF: <ToolBar FocusManager.IsFocusScope="False" Grid.Row="1" Name="tools" DataContext="{Binding Path=WeekNavigator}"> <Button Content="_>" Command="{Binding Path=CommandNavigateToNextWeek}"/> </ToolBar> The text of the button displays "_>" instead of just ">" and the mnemonic doesn't work. If I move the Button outside of the ToolBar it works as expected. How can I get the button to behave the same way inside a toolbar (with regards to mnemonics) as outside of one? Try this: <ToolBar> <Button> <AccessText>_></AccessText> </Button> </ToolBar> 来源： https:/

I have this doubt about new Toolbar in Android. I have to create one Toolbar for each activity in my app or there are a best practice to create one Toolbar for all activities? I try create a Singleton inflating a layout and search a view ID to create a toolbar and return the same instance for all activities, but this don't work. Can anybody help me? :S Toolbar is just a view and you have to add it to your each Activity in which you want to show it. One way is to just put it in a separate layout file and include in your Activity layout. toolbar.xml <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

I have a problem with that : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <android.support.design.widget.CoordinatorLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto" android:id="@+id/coordinatorLayout" android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="match_parent"> <android.support.design.widget.AppBarLayout android:id="@+id/appBarLayout" android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content"> <android.support.v7.widget.Toolbar android:id="@+id/toolbar" android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout

Figured out how to hide the grippy dots on the left side, now how do I hide that add/remove buttons drop-down arrow on the right side? Andrei Pana Google is full with the answer to this: private void ToolBar_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { ToolBar toolBar = sender as ToolBar; var overflowGrid = toolBar.Template.FindName("OverflowGrid", toolBar) as FrameworkElement; if (overflowGrid != null) { overflowGrid.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; } var mainPanelBorder = toolBar.Template.FindName("MainPanelBorder", toolBar) as FrameworkElement; if (mainPanelBorder != null) { mainPanelBorder

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I was having some minor bug with fragment transaction. The problem occurs when I opened up more than one fragment and press the back button and the title shown on toolbar is wrong. For instance, from my Home -> Expenses fragment , and I press back button from Expenses fragment, the title shown on toolbar is correct. However, let's say Home -> Expenses -> Incomes fragment , and I press back button from Incomes fragment, it will go back to Home fragment, but the title shown on toolbar will be 'Expenses' instead of 'Home'. Here is my set up for

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have large time-traces that must be inspected visually, so I need a fast scrolling tool. How can I achieve the fastest Maplotlib/Pyside scrolling? Right know, I added a PySide scroll-bar to a MPL figure and update the x-range of the plot with set_xlim() method. This is not fast enough especially because in the final application I have at least 8 time-traces in different subplots that must all scroll together. A figure of the plot is attached . Is there room for improvement? Here I attach the demo code that demonstrate the relatively low