throttling

Throttling requests with multiple proxies

雨燕双飞 提交于 2019-11-28 05:32:07
问题 I'm currently assigning random proxies to requests via a custom middleware. I'd like to key download throttling to the specific proxy that the request is using, but as far as I can tell, out of the box, this is only possible when tied to domains or IPs. I'm worried that implementing pooling logic in the proxy middleware would cause thread safety issues. Has anyone done this before? Any pointers would be appreciated. 回答1: As recommended on the Scrapy mailing list, there is a special request

Throttling login attempts

匆匆过客 提交于 2019-11-28 04:45:39
(This is in principal a language-agnostic question, though in my case I am using ASP.NET 3.5) I am using the standard ASP.NET login control and would like to implement the following failed login attempt throttling logic. Handle the OnLoginError event and maintain, in Session , a count of failed login attempts When this count gets to [some configurable value] block further login attempts from the originating IP address or for that user / those users for 1 hour Does this sound like a sensible approach? Am I missing an obvious means by which such checks could be bypassed? Note: ASP.NET Session is

Throttling Async Functions in Python Asyncio

梦想与她 提交于 2019-11-28 04:35:52
I have a list of awaitables that I want to pass to the asyncio.AbstractEventLoop but I need to throttle the requests to a third party API. I would like to avoid something that waits to pass the future to the loop because in the meantime I block my loop waiting. What options do I have? Semaphores and ThreadPools will limit how many are running concurrently, but that's not my problem. I need to throttle my requests to 100/sec, but it doesn't matter how long it takes to complete the request. This is a very concise (non)working example using the standard library, that demonstrates the problem.

WCF stops responding after about 10 or so calls (throttling)

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-11-28 03:56:11
I have a WCF Service and an application with a Service Reference to it, and with the application I have a loop and in each iteration it's making a call to a method in this wcf web-service. The problem is that after about 9 calls or so, it just stops...and if you hit Pause button of VS, you will see that it's stuck on the line where it makes the call. After some time waiting for it, this TimeoutException is thrown: The request channel timed out while waiting for a reply after 00:00:59.9970000. Increase the timeout value passed to the call to Request or increase the SendTimeout value on the

Throttle and queue up API requests due to per second cap

自作多情 提交于 2019-11-28 03:54:27
I'm use mikeal/request to make API calls. One of the API's I use most frequently (the Shopify API). Recently put out a new call limit , I'm seeing errors like: Exceeded 6.0 calls per second for api client. Slow your requests or contact support for higher limits. I've already gotten an upgrade, but regardless of how much bandwidth I get I have to account for this. A large majority of the requests to the Shopify API are within async.map() functions, which loop asynchronous requests, and gather the bodies. I'm looking for any help, perhaps a library that already exists, that would wrap around the

Throttling CPU/Memory usage of a Thread in Java?

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-11-28 03:15:39
I'm writing an application that will have multiple threads running, and want to throttle the CPU/memory usage of those threads. There is a similar question for C++ , but I want to try and avoid using C++ and JNI if possible. I realize this might not be possible using a higher level language, but I'm curious to see if anyone has any ideas. EDIT: Added a bounty; I'd like some really good, well thought out ideas on this. EDIT 2: The situation I need this for is executing other people's code on my server. Basically it is completely arbitrary code, with the only guarantee being that there will be a

What is the best way to implement a rate-limiting algorithm for web requests?

我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-11-27 19:52:39
问题 Possible/partial duplicates: What’s a good rate limiting algorithm? Throttling method calls to M requests in N seconds Best way to implement request throttling in ASP.NET MVC? I am looking for the best way to implement a moving time window rate limiting algorithm for a web application to reduce spam or brute force attacks. Examples of use would be "Maximum number of failed login attempts from a given IP in the last 5 minutes", "Maximum number of (posts/votes/etc...) in the last N minutes". I

Tools for degrading my network connection? [closed]

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-11-27 19:08:13
I've written some applications than heavily use network, and I would like to test it over a slow network. I'm looking for a tool to simulate these kind of connections. I'm only interested in Windows tools. I've used Traffic Shaper XP on my XP dev box at work. It seems to handle any connection (not just HTTP). It wasn't perfect, but worked well enough for the tests I was doing. If you're on Windows maybe it'll do enough for you. Try dummynet . You will find lots of resources on the web, including this tutorial . Throughput, latency, jitter, and packet loss can all impact user experience.

How to use throttle or debounce with React Hook?

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-11-27 15:40:11
问题 I'm trying to use the throttle method from lodash in a fonctionnal component, e.g.: const App = () => { const [value, setValue] = useState(0) useEffect(throttle(() => console.log(value), 1000), [value]) return ( <button onClick={() => setValue(value + 1)}>{value}</button> ) } Since the method inside useEffect is redeclared at each render, the throttling effect does not work. Does anyone have a simple solution ? 回答1: you may(and probably need) useRef to store value between renders. Just like

Throttle amount of promises open at a given time

十年热恋 提交于 2019-11-27 15:17:46
The following Typescript performs each call to doSomething(action) one at a time. (Meaning the second item in the list does not get a call made until the first one is done). async performActionsOneAtATime() { for (let action of listOfActions) { const actionResult = await doSomethingOnServer(action); console.log(`Action Done: ${actionResult}`); } } This one will send all the requests to the server right away (without waiting for any responses): async performActionsInParallel() { for (let action of listOfActions) { const actionResultPromise = doSomething(action); actionResultPromise.then(