strcpy

C strcpy = Unhandled exception: Access violation writing location 0x00000000

久未见 提交于 2019-12-02 04:43:13
问题 I have a problem with strcpy function. Using C. Main point of this simple code (below) is copying a string from a array to the array of pointers. char string[20] = "ABCDEFGH\0"; char * array_of_pointers[20]; // now I want to copy string to the first available slot; strcpy(array_of_pointers[0],string); Then strcpy throws me error: Unhandled exception: Access violation writing location 0x00000000. Why? I know that this problem is probably simple, but I really don't have a clue. 回答1: The target

Why no segmentation fault on strcpy? [duplicate]

荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-12-02 00:53:55
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 7 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Undefined, unspecified and implementation-defined behavior This should seg fault. Why doesn't it. #include <string.h> #include <stdio.h> char str1[] = "Sample string. Sample string. Sample string. Sample string. Sample string. "; char str2[2]; int main () { strcpy (str2,str1); printf("%s\n", str2); return 0; } I am using gcc version 4.4.3 with the following command: gcc -std=c99 testString.c -o test I also tried

warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen' and 'strcpy' [duplicate]

旧巷老猫 提交于 2019-12-01 23:42:06
问题 This question already has answers here : warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘xyz’ (4 answers) Closed 4 years ago . I just finnished my hangman game and as a last step I am doing some code cleanup and optimization, but I can't seem to understand why I receive the following two warnings: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen' warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strcpy' The code in which they are used is

warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen' and 'strcpy' [duplicate]

只谈情不闲聊 提交于 2019-12-01 22:21:15
This question already has an answer here: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘xyz’ 4 answers I just finnished my hangman game and as a last step I am doing some code cleanup and optimization, but I can't seem to understand why I receive the following two warnings: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strlen' warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'strcpy' The code in which they are used is here: for(i = 1; i <= random; i++) fgets(word, 100, f); fclose(f); for(i = 0; i < strlen(word); i++) if(word[i] == '\n') word

Result of calling strcpy is different than expected

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-12-01 18:42:22
#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int main() { char src[]="123456"; strcpy(src, &src[1]); printf("Final copied string : %s\n", src); } When I use the Visual Studio 6 Compiler it gives me the expected answer " 23456 ". How come this program prints " 23556 " when compiled with gcc 4.7.2 ? strcpy(src, &src[1]); is undefined behavior: C11 §7.24.2.3 The strcpy function The strcpy function copies the string pointed to by s2 (including the terminating null character) into the array pointed to by s1 . If copying takes place between objects that overlap, the behavior is undefined. By the way,

Why is strcpy unsafe in C? [duplicate]

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-12-01 17:59:48
This question already has an answer here: Is the function strcpy always dangerous? 9 answers I am a beginner, and I am learning how to copy a string in C now. Here is a problem I just met: Every time I try to use "strcpy" command to copy from string 1 to string 2, Visual Studio 2013 will give me an error/warning message saying that "strcpy" is unsafe and suggest me to use strcpy_s instead. Can you please explain why is strcpy unsafe to use? And what are the safer alternatives to strcpy? Here is my code: #include<stdio.h> #include<string.h> main() { char str1[] = "Copy a string."; char str2[15]

Why is strcpy unsafe in C? [duplicate]

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-12-01 17:16:57
问题 This question already has answers here : Is the function strcpy always dangerous? (9 answers) Closed 5 years ago . I am a beginner, and I am learning how to copy a string in C now. Here is a problem I just met: Every time I try to use "strcpy" command to copy from string 1 to string 2, Visual Studio 2013 will give me an error/warning message saying that "strcpy" is unsafe and suggest me to use strcpy_s instead. Can you please explain why is strcpy unsafe to use? And what are the safer

Segmentation fault with strcpy() [duplicate]

我与影子孤独终老i 提交于 2019-12-01 15:31:06
This question already has an answer here: Why do I get a segmentation fault when writing to a string initialized with “char *s” but not “char s[]”? 17 answers This works: int main() { char *t = "Hello"; t = "World"; printf("%s", t); } But this gives segmentation fault: int main() { char *t = "Hello"; strcpy(t, "World"); // the only difference printf("%s", t); } Why? Strings that you define explicitly - e.g. "Hello" - are typically placed in an area of read-only memory. These strings cannot be changed. In the first example, you are not changing the "Hello" string into the "World" string. You

Segmentation fault with strcpy() [duplicate]

十年热恋 提交于 2019-12-01 13:34:09
问题 This question already has answers here : Why do I get a segmentation fault when writing to a string initialized with “char *s” but not “char s[]”? (17 answers) Closed 6 years ago . This works: int main() { char *t = "Hello"; t = "World"; printf("%s", t); } But this gives segmentation fault: int main() { char *t = "Hello"; strcpy(t, "World"); // the only difference printf("%s", t); } Why? 回答1: Strings that you define explicitly - e.g. "Hello" - are typically placed in an area of read-only

strcpy源码实现方式

五迷三道 提交于 2019-12-01 11:57:14
#include<bits/stdc++.h> using namespace std; char *strcpy(char *a,const char *b) { if(a == NULL || b == NULL) exit(0); char *c = a; while((*a++ = *b++) != '\0'); return c; } int main() { char a[2] = "a"; char b[] = "bdfasdfdsfab"; strcpy(a,b); cout << a << endl; return 0; }    来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/mch5201314/p/11684422.html