stopwatch

高并发利器之限流

早过忘川 提交于 2020-01-07 18:52:57
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 何为限流? 在开发高并发系统时,有三把利器用来保护系统:缓存、降级和限流。那么何为限流呢?顾名思义,限流就是限制流量,就像你宽带包了1个G的流量,用完了就没了。通过限流,我们可以很好地控制系统的qps,从而达到保护系统的目的。 常见限流算法 1、计算器算法 计数器算法是限流算法里最简单也是最容易实现的一种算法。比如我们规定,对于A接口来说,我们1分钟的访问次数不能超过100个。那么我们可以这么做:在一开 始的时候,我们可以设置一个计数器counter,每当一个请求过来的时候,counter就加1,如果counter的值大于100并且该请求与第一个 请求的间隔时间还在1分钟之内,那么说明请求数过多;如果该请求与第一个请求的间隔时间大于1分钟,且counter的值还在限流范围内,那么就重置 counter。 public class CounterTest { public long timeStamp = getNowTime(); public int reqCount = 0; public final int limit = 100; // 时间窗口内最大请求数 public final long interval = 1000; // 时间窗口ms public boolean grant() {

0102-aop

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2020-01-07 00:56:01
【推荐】2019 Java 开发者跳槽指南.pdf(吐血整理) >>> 背景 aop的概念很多,比如切点,通知,连接点,引入,织入等;实际上这是一种约定的流程; 约定编程 https://github.com/carterbrother/springbootpractice/tree/master/demo-aop aop编程 也是按照一定规则,按照一定 流程来约定编程的; 典型场景 数据库事物 提取固定 流程,把变化的部分织入到流程中即可; 概念 连接点(join point) : 即方法 切点 (point cut): 连接点的范围,哪些方法; 通知(advice): 分为前置通知,后置通知,环绕通知,正常返回通知,异常返回通知 目标对象(target) :被代理对象 引入(introduction): 引入新的类和方法,增强现有的bean的功能 织入(weaving): 通过代理技术,为原有对象生成代理对象 切面(aspect) : 可以定义切点,各类通知和引用的内容 springboot的aop的使用 @Aspect 申明切面 通知里面放切点: @Before 前置通知 @After 后置通知 @AfterReturn @AfterThrowning @Around @Pointcut 定义切点 切点的指示器: 通知中的参数: ProceedingJoinPoint jp

How to stop a Timer object after a set interval of time?

耗尽温柔 提交于 2020-01-05 08:11:14
问题 I've assigned a string value from a text box to a date time variable.It's purpose is to serve as a flag to tell myTimer object to stop when it has reached the the time stored in workDt,(the date time variable). The current implementation I have tried is the following, where I set up an if..else statement to check if the timer's current time is equal to what was entered in the text box but it doesn't trigger the timer to stop. I set a break point on the 'if' statement and the time value is

Precisely measure execution time of code in thread (C#)

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2020-01-01 04:22:07
问题 I'm trying to measure the execution time of some bits of code as accurately as possible on a number of threads, taking context switching and thread downtime into account. The application is implemented in C# (VS 2008). Example: public void ThreadFunc () { // Some code here // Critical block #1 begins here long lTimestamp1 = Stopwatch.GetTimestamp (); CallComplex3rdPartyFunc (); // A long lTimestamp2 = Stopwatch.GetTimestamp (); // Critical block #1 ends here // Some code here // Critical

Multicore and thread aware .Net stopwatch?

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-12-29 07:25:14
问题 As we all know the stopwatch might have issues in a multi-threaded async application that will be running on all cores. On a multiprocessor computer, it does not matter which processor the thread runs on. However, because of bugs in the BIOS or the Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL), you can get different timing results on different processors. To specify processor affinity for a thread, use the ProcessThread.ProcessorAffinity method. Are there any way for me to get some reliable tick/timestamp

What, if any, is the resource penalty for using System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-12-29 06:17:31
问题 For example foo() //Some operation bound by an external resource. db,I/O, whatever. vs. var watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); foo() var time = watch.ElapsedMilliseconds watch.Stop(); 回答1: I believe Stopwatch is built on top of QueryPerformanceCounter, so each call results in a kernel transition. If foo() is very brief, the QPC overhead will dwarf it. If you're using Stopwatch to measure short tasks, you should run foo() many times (like thousands), and use Stopwatch around the whole

Time Elapsed or Response Time Results always Up / Grow Up make it stable

佐手、 提交于 2019-12-25 09:15:53
问题 in Posting Before : I want to get response time on a simple math value if "button calculate" press, get sum value a and value b in textbox and also show how long to proceed that math calculation (response time) in textbox. BUT why my result always grow up / always up like in picture how to make result stable and less volatile ? the result when i click calculate button on a continuous picture coding button calculate Private Sub Button4_Click(sender As System.Object, e As System.EventArgs)

How to implment laps in Stop Watch iphone app

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-12-23 18:50:08
问题 I am building one application which has stop watch as its accessory function. I am trying to do something very similar to iOS stop watch. I got stop, reset functionality working but I could not get start (once it stop and user click on start) and lap functions working properly. I tried to look around for this problem but I could not find anything besides one time start and reset stop watch tutorials.Here is what I have right now. Can anyone help me out here with this functions ? // Stop Watch

Why does the conditional (ternary) operator seem significantly faster?

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-23 11:22:27
问题 EDIT If I use Stopwatch correctly and up the number of iterations by two orders of magnitude I get Ternary took 22404ms Normal took 21403ms These results are closer to what I was expecting and make me feel all is right with the world (if not with my code.) The Ternary/Conditional operator is in fact marginally slower. Following on from this question, which I have partially answered. I compile this console app in x64 Release Mode, with optimizations on, and run it from the command line without

Is Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks threadsafe?

五迷三道 提交于 2019-12-23 07:56:01
问题 If I have a shared System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch instance, can multiple threads call shared.ElapsedTicks in a safe manner and get accurate results? Is there any difference in terms of thread-safety/accuracy between using a shared instance of Stopwatch in this way, and using the static GetTimeStamp() method? I'm measuring intervals of around 180ms, and finding that using the shared instance is giving me a larger spread of results, including a significant number that are shorter than I would