stopiteration

Stop Iteration error when using next()

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2021-02-09 09:27:44
问题 I am not able to clarify my self over the use of next() in python(3). I have a data : chr pos ms01e_PI ms01e_PG_al ms02g_PI ms02g_PG_al ms03g_PI ms03g_PG_al ms04h_PI ms04h_PG_al 2 15881989 4 C|C 6 A|C 7 C|C 7 C|C 2 15882091 4 A|T 6 A|T 7 T|A 7 A|A 2 15882148 4 T|T 6 T|T 7 T|T 7 T|G and I read it like: Works fine c = csv.DictReader(io.StringIO(data), dialect=csv.excel_tab) print(c) print(list(c)) Works fine c = csv.DictReader(io.StringIO(data), dialect=csv.excel_tab) print(c) keys = next(c)

Stop Iteration error when using next()

纵饮孤独 提交于 2021-02-09 09:17:17
问题 I am not able to clarify my self over the use of next() in python(3). I have a data : chr pos ms01e_PI ms01e_PG_al ms02g_PI ms02g_PG_al ms03g_PI ms03g_PG_al ms04h_PI ms04h_PG_al 2 15881989 4 C|C 6 A|C 7 C|C 7 C|C 2 15882091 4 A|T 6 A|T 7 T|A 7 A|A 2 15882148 4 T|T 6 T|T 7 T|T 7 T|G and I read it like: Works fine c = csv.DictReader(io.StringIO(data), dialect=csv.excel_tab) print(c) print(list(c)) Works fine c = csv.DictReader(io.StringIO(data), dialect=csv.excel_tab) print(c) keys = next(c)

Why does next raise a 'StopIteration', but 'for' do a normal return?

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-17 06:34:27
问题 In this piece of code, why does using for result in no StopIteration or is the for loop trapping all exceptions and then silently exiting? In which case, why do we have the extraneous return ?? Or is the raise StopIteration caused by: return None ? #!/usr/bin/python3.1 def countdown(n): print("counting down") while n >= 9: yield n n -= 1 return for x in countdown(10): print(x) c = countdown(10) next(c) next(c) next(c) Assuming StopIteration is being triggered by: return None . When is

Sending StopIteration to for loop from outside of the iterator

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-05 23:33:31
问题 There are several ways to break out of a few nested loops They are: 1) to use break-continue for x in xrange(10): for y in xrange(10): print x*y if x*y > 50: break else: continue # only executed if break was not used break 2) to use return def foo(): for x in range(10): for y in range(10): print x*y if x*y > 50: return foo() 3) to use special exception class BreakIt(Exception): pass try: for x in range(10): for y in range(10): print x*y if x*y > 50: raise BreakIt except BreakIt: pass I had

Sending StopIteration to for loop from outside of the iterator

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-12-04 05:03:53
There are several ways to break out of a few nested loops They are: 1) to use break-continue for x in xrange(10): for y in xrange(10): print x*y if x*y > 50: break else: continue # only executed if break was not used break 2) to use return def foo(): for x in range(10): for y in range(10): print x*y if x*y > 50: return foo() 3) to use special exception class BreakIt(Exception): pass try: for x in range(10): for y in range(10): print x*y if x*y > 50: raise BreakIt except BreakIt: pass I had some thought that there could be some other way to do it. It is by using StopIteration exception sent

python yield and stopiteration in one loop?

孤者浪人 提交于 2019-12-03 15:20:01
问题 i have a generator where i would like to add an initial and final value to the actual content, it's something like this: # any generic queue where i would like to get something from q = Queue() def gen( header='something', footer='anything' ): # initial value header yield header for c in count(): # get from the queue i = q.get() # if we don't have any more data from the queue, spit out the footer and stop if i == None: yield footer raise StopIteration else: yield i Of course, the above code

How can I get a Python generator to return None rather than StopIteration?

狂风中的少年 提交于 2019-12-03 14:23:11
问题 I am using generators to perform searches in lists like this simple example: >>> a = [1,2,3,4] >>> (i for i, v in enumerate(a) if v == 4).next() 3 (Just to frame the example a bit, I am using very much longer lists compared to the one above, and the entries are a little bit more complicated than int . I do it this way so the entire lists won't be traversed each time I search them) Now if I would instead change that to i == 666 , it would return a StopIteration because it can't find any 666

python yield and stopiteration in one loop?

不问归期 提交于 2019-12-03 04:57:56
i have a generator where i would like to add an initial and final value to the actual content, it's something like this: # any generic queue where i would like to get something from q = Queue() def gen( header='something', footer='anything' ): # initial value header yield header for c in count(): # get from the queue i = q.get() # if we don't have any more data from the queue, spit out the footer and stop if i == None: yield footer raise StopIteration else: yield i Of course, the above code doesn't work - my problem is that i would like it such that when there's nothing left in the queue, i

How can I get a Python generator to return None rather than StopIteration?

人走茶凉 提交于 2019-12-03 04:11:34
I am using generators to perform searches in lists like this simple example: >>> a = [1,2,3,4] >>> (i for i, v in enumerate(a) if v == 4).next() 3 (Just to frame the example a bit, I am using very much longer lists compared to the one above, and the entries are a little bit more complicated than int . I do it this way so the entire lists won't be traversed each time I search them) Now if I would instead change that to i == 666 , it would return a StopIteration because it can't find any 666 entry in a . How can I make it return None instead? I could of course wrap it in a try ... except clause,

Python PEP479 Change StopIteration handling inside generators

流过昼夜 提交于 2019-12-01 04:05:39
Could someone help me understand what PEP479 is about? I was reading the doc and couldn't get my head around it. The abstract says: This PEP proposes a change to generators: when StopIteration is raised inside a generator, it is replaced it with RuntimeError. (More precisely, this happens when the exception is about to bubble out of the generator's stack frame.) So for example, does a loop like so still work? it = iter([1,2,3]) try: i = next(it) while True: i = next(it) except StopIteration: pass Or does it mean that if I have a generator definition like so: def gen(): yield from range(5)