stateserver

SQLServer vs StateServer for ASP.NET Session State Performance

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-12-28 03:47:48
问题 I'm studying for a MS certification and one of the practice tests I'm doing has a question where the point of contention is the performance between storing the session in SQL Server as opposed to StateServer. Given the app is running in a web farm, which solution for session state gives the best performance (SQL Server or StateServer) and most importantly, why? 回答1: State Server is faster because it stores session data in an in-memory dictionary. SQL Server is slower because it's stored in a

SQLServer vs StateServer for ASP.NET Session State Performance

你。 提交于 2019-12-28 03:47:07
问题 I'm studying for a MS certification and one of the practice tests I'm doing has a question where the point of contention is the performance between storing the session in SQL Server as opposed to StateServer. Given the app is running in a web farm, which solution for session state gives the best performance (SQL Server or StateServer) and most importantly, why? 回答1: State Server is faster because it stores session data in an in-memory dictionary. SQL Server is slower because it's stored in a

How to start ASP.Net State Service in Azure

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-12-10 11:04:34
问题 While deploying my application in azure i got this error when a session variable is used I know this error is due to ASP.Net state server mode . I started the service in my local PC but how to start this service in Azure environment? 回答1: You can use a start up task to spin up the State Service (or really any service for that matter). However, I would highly recommend that you do not use the session state service. I'd recommend looking at the In Role Windows Azure Cache or the Windows Azure

How to start ASP.Net State Service in Azure

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-06 12:58:02
While deploying my application in azure i got this error when a session variable is used I know this error is due to ASP.Net state server mode . I started the service in my local PC but how to start this service in Azure environment? You can use a start up task to spin up the State Service (or really any service for that matter). However, I would highly recommend that you do not use the session state service. I'd recommend looking at the In Role Windows Azure Cache or the Windows Azure Cache Service (Preview) for session state. By using the session service you separate your session concerns

ASP.NET Session State Performance Benchmarks

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-12-03 16:40:42
问题 I have found a lot of great information comparing InProc, StateServer, and SQLServer for ASP.NET state management, but I can't seem find any performance benchmark comparisons. It is clear that InProc is faster than StateServer which in turn is faster than SQLServer, but it isn't clear how much faster. I realize that it's going to vary greatly by application and environment, but having a relative idea of how they compare would be valuable. Do you know of any benchmarks that have been performed

Pros and Cons of using ASP.NET Session State Server (instead of InProc)?

▼魔方 西西 提交于 2019-12-03 16:08:52
问题 Before I start using Session State server for the benefit of making session state more robust in my apps compared to InProc state, I'd like to find a list of Pros and Cons for evaluation. Update 1 : Also about surviving application pool recycles? Update 2 : What about longevity of sessions and their endings? 回答1: Here's the canonical analysis of the pros and cons of your three options, from Rob Howard's ASP.NET Session State article: In process . In process will perform best because the

ASP.NET Session State Performance Benchmarks

微笑、不失礼 提交于 2019-12-03 05:51:05
I have found a lot of great information comparing InProc, StateServer, and SQLServer for ASP.NET state management, but I can't seem find any performance benchmark comparisons. It is clear that InProc is faster than StateServer which in turn is faster than SQLServer, but it isn't clear how much faster. I realize that it's going to vary greatly by application and environment, but having a relative idea of how they compare would be valuable. Do you know of any benchmarks that have been performed that you could share? or have any personal experience with this? Thank you! There's a good benchmarks

Pros and Cons of using ASP.NET Session State Server (instead of InProc)?

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-03 05:34:36
Before I start using Session State server for the benefit of making session state more robust in my apps compared to InProc state, I'd like to find a list of Pros and Cons for evaluation. Update 1 : Also about surviving application pool recycles? Update 2 : What about longevity of sessions and their endings? Here's the canonical analysis of the pros and cons of your three options, from Rob Howard's ASP.NET Session State article: In process . In process will perform best because the session state memory is kept within the ASP.NET process. For Web applications hosted on a single server,

Why can't I share Session state between 2 web apps with StateServer? What am I missing?

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-11-28 11:03:27
I'm having trouble getting 2 identical ASP.NET MVC applications to share the same Session using a Session StateServer. The reason I'm trying to do this is we will eventually be deploying this app across 3 web servers that need to share the same state. We need to use StateServer because we are trying to minimise use of the db for non data-related storage. The Setup: I've deployed the same code base to http://localhost/ App1 and http://localhost/ App2 both have identical Web.Config files with the following: <system.web> <sessionState mode="StateServer" cookieless="false" timeout="20"

How to maintain the same session id across multiple web applications in ASP.NET

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-28 08:45:21
I have two identical applications setup on IIS on different virtual directories (I have done some workaround to ensure that they both have the same application name). Is there a way to share session id across two asp.net web applications? Since I'm storing the session in StateServer, they should both be getting the same session data, however, a different session id is created everytime I go from application a to applicatino b. Wouldn't this happen in a load balancing scenario as well? Where when I go to www.test.com, it would redirect that request to server a, and then if I hit it again, it