stack-overflow

This is simple to explain: this works using System; using ConstraintSet = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<System.String, double>; namespace ConsoleApplication2 { class test { public ConstraintSet a { get; set; } public test() { a = new ConstraintSet(); } static void Main(string[] args) { test abc = new test(); Console.WriteLine("done"); } } } this does not using System; using ConstraintSet = System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<System.String, double>; namespace ConsoleApplication2 { class test { public ConstraintSet a { get { return a; } set { a = value; } } public test() { a = new

We have discovered that one of our auto generated assemblies is throwing a StackOverflowException on new(). This class has (bear with me please) 400+ simple properties that are initialised (most by default(string) etc) in a constructor. We notice that its fine on 64 bits but on 32 bits it goes bang! We need to test if it's reasonable for our use case to create a larger default stack to give us breathing room while we reengineer the code generator. We would esp. interested in solutions that involve app.config if possible. But I'm a realist so anything would be good. Re reasons for the the stack

Image a Person and a Group class with a many-to-many relationship. A person has a list of groups and a group has a list of people. When mapping Person to PersonDTO I have a stack overflow exception because AutoMapper can't handle the Person > Groups > Members > Groups > Members >... So here's the example code: public class Person { public string Name { get; set; } public List<Group> Groups { get; set; } } public class Group { public string Name { get; set; } public List<Person> Members { get; set; } } public class PersonDTO { public string Name { get; set; } public List<GroupDTO> Groups { get;

I am developing a .Net 2.0 application in which a StackOverflowException occurs. Is there a way to print/log the stack trace before/during the application aborts? This is a long running server-side process which would be hard to execute under a debugger. I know that StackOverflowException can not be caught. Brian Rasmussen Use ADPlus (from Windows Debugging Tools) to force a dump on crash. E.g. adplus -hang -pn <process name> -o <dump file> 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2591406/how-to-print-stack-trace-of-stackoverflowexception

Rather simple scenario really, but I could not find anything related on Google so here goes: class ContainerClass implements Parcelable { List<ItemClass> _items; (...) public void writeToParcel( Parcel p, int args ) { p.writeList( _items ); (...) } } class ItemClass implements Parcelable { ContainerClass _containerRef; (...) public void writeToParcel( Parcel p, int args ) { p.writeParcelable( _containerRef ); (...) } } This will inevitably loop and overflow the stack. My question: How am I supposed to deal with a situation where I have to pass an object of the above types through to a new

I have created classes using EF Code First that have collections of each other. Entities: public class Field { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public virtual List<AppUser> Teachers { get; set; } public Field() { Teachers = new List<AppUser>(); } } public class AppUser { public int Id { get; set; } public string Email { get; set; } public string Password { get; set; } public string UserName => Email; public virtual List<Field> Fields { get; set; } public AppUser() { Fields = new List<FieldDTO>(); } } DTOs: public class FieldDTO { public int Id { get; set; } public