spring-data-neo4j

How to search node using cypher query where one of the node property having array of string ? e.g. members-- > ["abc","xyz","pqr"] . I can find the node by keeping order of array elements in same manner, for e.g. START root=node(*) where has(root.members) and root.members=["abc","xyz","pqr"] return root; but How to search node if I do not / cannot provide the exact order of elements as they are in node property ? Use the "all" predicate to ensure every element in the root.member is in the given list, i.e. root.members is a subset of the given list, and the length expression ensures that the

What is the best way to achieve multi-tenancy in neo4j? I have seen Tinkerpop and Spring Data. I'm have multiple clients and I would like to store client info in its own database to ensure security. I do not want to use labels or indexes to solve this problem. stephen mallette You mention that you've "seen TinkerPop" but I couldn't tell if that meant you've seen it, considered it and dismissed it as a solution here, so apologies if that is the case and I'm not answering your question. I've successfully used PartitionStrategy (formerly PartitionGraph ) from TinkerPop to achieve multi-tenancy in

I would like to follow the separation of concerns design principle in a new Java EE web app. If I understand correctly, this means that I have to keep the technical choices of my DAL (Data Access Layer) invisible from my model/business layer. As I use Spring Data Neo4j, I must annotate my model beans with e.g. "@NodeEntity", an annotation which is specific to Spring Data Neo4J. This seems to mix the model layer with the Data Access Layer. Is this a good analysis I'm doing here? If so, how can I have a model which is independant of my DAL using Spring Data Neo4j annotations? Thanks for your

I just learnt that when I create a relationship between 2 nodes in neo4j, both of them are locked ( http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/stable/transactions-locking.html ). However, in our project, we have elements that we can instanciate and we finnaly have two nodes in the graph linked by a "INSTANCE_OF" relationship. For exemple if I instanciate element B, I have a new element B1. They are stored in the graph like B<-INSTANCE_OF-B1. My problem is that many users can instanciate element B on same time and it result in deadlocks. How can I avoid these deadlocks please ? I don't need to write

I am trying to generate the Index and Constraint for my spring entities. I am not using any capability of spring-data to do it such as indexes.auto=assert . How can I generate the scripts with following conditions I need to generate scripts in offline mode. ie I cannot provide any Neo4j server,user,password etc. I need to use the java api to achieve it. I am able to create liquigraph change-log but I can't find a way to generate the script. The maven dependency I have used is <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.liquigraph/liquigraph-core --> <dependency> <groupId>org.liquigraph<

For example, if I want to get list of users by name: class UserRepository extands GraphRepository<User> { List<User> findByName(String name); } then how to set loading depth to 2? I tried to find answer in the SDN 4.0.0.RC2 docs , but it isn't contains anything about this issue. Derived finders do not yet support a depth. You'll have to write a custom query or use the loadAllByProperty method on the Neo4jTemplate if applicable. This should have been mentioned in the docs, we'll add it. As of SDN 4.2.0-M1 , this feature has been implemented. It hasn't made it to the reference documentation at