specflow

问题 I have done this a couple of times before, but it's not working today. Am I missing something? I want to configure Specflow from the scract, using NUnit and to execute inside Visual Studio. I've seen many tutorials but they are not working to me :P. I'm trying to use the latest versions. These are the steps I'm doing on Visual Studio 2017: Create a test project (.NET Framework) Install Specflow plugin for Visual Studio (Tools > Extensions and Updates) Delete reference of MSTests from the

问题 I am using SpecFlow with NUnit3 and am trying to access the step context within a hook. I am running the tests in parallel so not using any static instance contexts, but using the parameter resolving feature of SpecFlow. With a hook like below, the ScenarioContext instance resolves fine, but the ScenarioStepContext causes the binding to throw error: Primitive types or structs cannot be resolved: TechTalk.SpecFlow.Bindings.StepDefinitionType (resolution path: TechTalk.SpecFlow

问题 I am using SpecFlow with NUnit3 and am trying to access the step context within a hook. I am running the tests in parallel so not using any static instance contexts, but using the parameter resolving feature of SpecFlow. With a hook like below, the ScenarioContext instance resolves fine, but the ScenarioStepContext causes the binding to throw error: Primitive types or structs cannot be resolved: TechTalk.SpecFlow.Bindings.StepDefinitionType (resolution path: TechTalk.SpecFlow

问题 Please can you help me in providing an solution on how to pass parameter in Scenario outline description of Spec Flow? Please see below for an example: Scenario Outline : Testing **<Application>** Given I navigate to <Application> Then I should see Home page Examples: | Application | | Test | | Test1 | I know this is possible in Cucumber but don't know the way to do it in Specflow. Appreciate your response. Thanks in advance. 回答1: There is no benefit in doing this. Just write a generic

问题 I am implementing a project for the proof of concept and here is what i am using: VS 2013,MSTest/Test Explorer, Specflow and specrun I have created 3 specflow feature files, each having it's own sets of different scenarios. When I run these tests from test explorer i can successfully see all the scenarios in each feature file running one by one and that's absolutely fine. Next, I want to run all the 3 feature files in parallel. Is there a way to do this? All my feature files are completely

问题 We have utilized Specflow and WatIn for acceptance tests at my current project. The customer wants us to use Microsoft coded-ui instead. I have never tested coded ui, but from what I've seen so far it looks cumbersome. I want to specify my acceptance tests up front, before I have a ui, not as a result of some record/playback stuff. Anyway, can someone please tell me why we should throw away the Specflow/watin combo and replace it with coded ui? I've also read that you can combine specflow

问题 We're trying to implement global hooks on our specflow tests and are not entirely sure how [BeforeScenario] and [AfterScenario] attributed methods work. The way I've seen it done, those attributes are always defined in a class containing specific steps used in a few scenarios. Can they go somewhere so they apply to all scenarios? Or does attributing the methods with [BeforeScenario] and [AfterScenario] cause them to be run for all scenarios, regardless of where they're actually placed? 回答1:

问题 We're trying to implement global hooks on our specflow tests and are not entirely sure how [BeforeScenario] and [AfterScenario] attributed methods work. The way I've seen it done, those attributes are always defined in a class containing specific steps used in a few scenarios. Can they go somewhere so they apply to all scenarios? Or does attributing the methods with [BeforeScenario] and [AfterScenario] cause them to be run for all scenarios, regardless of where they're actually placed? 回答1:

问题 I am learning Behavior Driven Development with ASP.NET MVC and, based on a post from Steve Sanderson, understand that BDD can mean, at least, the following test types: individual units of code & UI interactions. Something similar is mentioned in this post. Do I need two different test frameworks if I want both unit and integration testing? Unit testing repositories, controllers, & services using a context/specification framework, like MSpec. The results of testing with this will be useful to

问题 I am trying to decide if I should use Cuke4Nuke or SpecFlow. What are the pro/cons of each? Opinions on which is better and why. Thanks! 回答1: (I might be biased because I am involved with SpecFlow, but here my thoughts...) Cuke4Nuke is very close to Cucumber. This promises a lot of advantages: Compatibility Getting new features from Cucumber when Cucumber evolves (at least in theory, but language support is an example for this) Being a real part of the Cucumber community and the Cucumber