size

I can understand that many years ago there would be this kind of limitation, but nowadays surely this limit could easily be increased. We have naming conventions for objects, but there is always a case that turns up where we hit this limit - especially in naming foreign keys. Does anybody actually know why this isn't a bigger size - or is it bigger in 11g? Apparently the answer is that it will break currently scripts that aren't defensively coded. I say that is a very worrying thing, Oracle is trying to be the database, surely this is the kind of thing that you must constantly improve,

Suppose I'm writing a couple of files to disk, between 2MB and 5GB. What are sensible buffer values for the FileStream ? Is it sensible to work with buffersizes of several megabytes, or should I stick to kilobyte-buffers ? Rubens Farias Default buffer size is 4 KiB. Also, take a look here: Sequential File Programming Patterns and Performance with .NET A quick little benchmark based on the document referenced shows no increase in performance on my system greater than 128KB buffer size. Your mileage may vary, feel free to use the below. Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch(); Random rand = new Random();

I want a simple solution for list of folders and size of them in either txt or csv format. I use this code for folder list dir C:\Temp\*.* /b /a:d > C:\folderList.txt current output <<folderList.txt>> folder1 folder2 folder3 desired output <<folderList.txt>> folder1 # 100 MB folder2 # 30 MB folder3 # 110 MB Simply it would generate the size of each folder.. How can I proceed?? any help For each folder in the list, use dir command to retrieve the size of the files under the folder @echo off setlocal disabledelayedexpansion set "folder=%~1" if not defined folder set "folder=%cd%" for /d %%a in (

How do I reliably get the size of a C-style array? The method often recommended seems to be to use sizeof , but it doesn't work in the foo function, where x is passed in: #include <iostream> void foo(int x[]) { std::cerr << (sizeof(x) / sizeof(int)); // 2 } int main(){ int x[] = {1,2,3,4,5}; std::cerr << (sizeof(x) / sizeof(int)); // 5 foo(x); return 0; } Answers to this question recommend sizeof but they don't say that it (apparently?) doesn't work if you pass the array around. So, do I have to use a sentinel instead? (I don't think the users of my foo function can always be trusted to put a

Possible Duplicate: Sizeof array passed as parameter Given the function below I understand that sizeof returns the size of the pointer of the type in the array. int myFunc(char my_array[5]) { return sizeof(my_array); } However calling sizeof on an array not passed as a parameter normally returns the sizeof the array. What causes this inconsistency? What is the best way of getting the size of an array when it is passed as a parameter? What causes this inconsistency? The name of the array decays as an pointer to its first element. When you pass an array to an function, this decaying takes place