set

Unable to use Set to remove duplicate pair numbers

点点圈 提交于 2020-01-06 18:32:11
问题 Let's say I want to generate 20 random numbers on a 8 by 6 grid.(8 columns, 6 rows) . Based on the answer from here:Creating random numbers with no duplicates, I wrote my code like this: Random randomNumGenerator = new Random(); Set<Integer[][]> generated = new LinkedHashSet<Integer[][]>(); while (generated.size() < 20) { int randomRows = randomNumGenerator.nextInt(6); int randomColumns = randomNumGenerator.nextInt(8); generated.add(new Integer[][]{{randomRows,randomColumns}}); } In reality

Why the Sets have keys equals to values?

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2020-01-06 11:44:31
问题 The book Understanding ECMAScript 6 states that Sets don’t have keys, however. The people behind the ECMAScript 6 standard could have made the callback function in the set version of forEach() accept two arguments, but that would have made it different from the other two. Instead, they found a way to keep the callback function the same and accept three arguments: each value in a set is considered to be the key and the value. As such, the frst and second argument are always the same in forEach

Why the Sets have keys equals to values?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2020-01-06 11:44:13
问题 The book Understanding ECMAScript 6 states that Sets don’t have keys, however. The people behind the ECMAScript 6 standard could have made the callback function in the set version of forEach() accept two arguments, but that would have made it different from the other two. Instead, they found a way to keep the callback function the same and accept three arguments: each value in a set is considered to be the key and the value. As such, the frst and second argument are always the same in forEach

Merging Bit, Enum and Set fields in MySql

不想你离开。 提交于 2020-01-06 08:51:08
问题 I know up to eight Bit fields are merged into one byte to save space, but what if I have a couple of Bit fields and an Enum or a Set field? Are they internally merged too? I'm asking because I'm going to have a lot of rows in my table and I want to avoid overhead as much as possible. 回答1: According to the reference, SET fields use one byte minimum so those are out for any kind of merging. Update: ENUM is out, too: They take at least one byte as well. Reference 来源: https://stackoverflow.com

why it crashes when assigning new values to arrays? [duplicate]

大憨熊 提交于 2020-01-06 07:57:47
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 7 years ago . Possible Duplicate: Could not allocate memory My following code runs fine: double weight [600] [800][3]; double mean [600] [800][3]; double sd [600] [800][3]; double u_diff [600] [800][3]; for ( int i = 0; i < 600; i ++ ) { for ( int j = 0; j < 800; j ++ ) { for ( int k=0; k < 3; m ++ ) { weight [i][j][k] = 0; mean[i][j][k] = 0; sd[i][j][k] = 6; } } } But when I change it into this form: int init = 6; int C = 3; for ( int i = 0; i

Efficiently find an item in a Set [duplicate]

扶醉桌前 提交于 2020-01-06 06:54:44
问题 This question already has answers here : Javascript search for an object key in a set (5 answers) Closed 10 months ago . if I need to find an object in a Set. The set does not contain a natural key to use as an index, so I can't use Map. There are several different types of predicates used to search the Set. It seems inefficient to do const items = Array.from( mySet ) const found = items.find( item => someTest( item ) ) Unless there's black magic in the optimiser, it seems like it will

Set of custom class objects and their < operator

雨燕双飞 提交于 2020-01-06 06:09:20
问题 I am trying to implement A* algorithm (with visualization in Qt). I've got this method: result_path astar_algorithm::calculate(mapview* m_view) { map_view = m_view; auto closed_set = std::vector<std::shared_ptr<node>>(); auto start_node = std::make_shared<node>(_start); auto open_set = std::vector<std::shared_ptr<node>>{start_node}; std::map<node, node> came_from; std::shared_ptr<node> current; while (!open_set.empty()) { current = *std::min_element(open_set.begin(), open_set.end()); if (

Sometimes my set comes out ordered and sometimes not (Python)

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2020-01-06 03:43:04
问题 So I know that a set is supposed to be an unordered list. I am trying to do some coding of my own and ended up with a weird happening. My set will sometimes go in order from 1 - 100 (when using a larger number) and when I use a smaller number it will stay unordered. Why is that? #Steps: #1) Take a number value for total random numbers in 1-100 #2) Put those numbers into a set (which will remove duplicates) #3) Print that set and the total number of random numbers import random randomnums = 0

Mysql SET NAMES UTF8 - how to get rid of?

我是研究僧i 提交于 2020-01-06 03:26:07
问题 In a very busy PHP script we have a call at the beginning to "Set names utf8" which is setting the character set in which mysql should interpret and send the data back from the server to the client. http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/charset-applications.html I want to get rid of it so I set default-character-set=utf8 In our server ini file. (see link above) The setting seems to be working since the relevant server parameters are : 'character_set_client', 'utf8' 'character_set_connection'

JavaScript sets and value objects [duplicate]

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2020-01-05 11:25:08
问题 This question already has answers here : user defined object equality for a set in harmony (es6) (2 answers) Closed 4 years ago . I want to create a set of value objects in JavaScript. The problem is that in JavaScript equality is based on identity. Hence, two different objects with the same value will be treated as unequal: var objects = new Set; objects.add({ a: 1 }); objects.add({ a: 1 }); alert(objects.size); // expected 1, actual 2 How do you work around this problem? 回答1: Use JSON