rx-java

Preventing rapid clicks with RXJava

喜你入骨 提交于 2020-04-12 19:57:00
问题 I am writing an android app and using rxjava to handle user input events. Basically what I want to do is, emit when a button is clicked, and then drop subsequent emissions for some period of time afterwards (like a second or two), essentially to prevent having to process multiple clicks of the button. 回答1: I think throttleFirst is what you want: https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava/wiki/Filtering-Observables#wiki-throttlefirst 回答2: For preventing fast clicks i use this code RxView.clicks(your

Preventing rapid clicks with RXJava

孤街浪徒 提交于 2020-04-12 19:56:51
问题 I am writing an android app and using rxjava to handle user input events. Basically what I want to do is, emit when a button is clicked, and then drop subsequent emissions for some period of time afterwards (like a second or two), essentially to prevent having to process multiple clicks of the button. 回答1: I think throttleFirst is what you want: https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava/wiki/Filtering-Observables#wiki-throttlefirst 回答2: For preventing fast clicks i use this code RxView.clicks(your

Preventing rapid clicks with RXJava

时间秒杀一切 提交于 2020-04-12 19:54:40
问题 I am writing an android app and using rxjava to handle user input events. Basically what I want to do is, emit when a button is clicked, and then drop subsequent emissions for some period of time afterwards (like a second or two), essentially to prevent having to process multiple clicks of the button. 回答1: I think throttleFirst is what you want: https://github.com/Netflix/RxJava/wiki/Filtering-Observables#wiki-throttlefirst 回答2: For preventing fast clicks i use this code RxView.clicks(your

How to update UI with network error response in MVVM using NetworkBoundResource

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2020-04-10 05:34:41
问题 I'm trying to implement MVVM pattern usingGoogle's android architecture components while using RX Java in NetworkBoundResource . However I'm having a difficult time finding a way to communicate the error response from network call to activity. here is a link to the original github project. I have read this post about "Refactoring google's NetworkBoundResource class to use RxJava instead of LiveData" but still not clear how to actually solve the problem. would appreciate if you could direct me

Refactoring google's NetworkBoundResource class to use RxJava instead of LiveData

孤者浪人 提交于 2020-03-17 07:33:47
问题 Google's android architecture components tutorial here has a part that explains how to abstract the logic of getting data over the network. In it, they create an abstract class called NetworkBoundResource using LiveData to create a reactive stream as the basis for all reactive network requests. public abstract class NetworkBoundResource<ResultType, RequestType> { private final AppExecutors appExecutors; private final MediatorLiveData<Resource<ResultType>> result = new MediatorLiveData<>();

Why is there no information output from the console after two seconds — Rxjava

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2020-03-16 07:25:09
问题 public class RxJavaTest { public static void main(String[] args) { Observable.timer(2, TimeUnit.SECONDS).subscribe(new Consumer<Long>() { @Override public void accept(Long aLong) throws Exception { System.out.println("timer: accept " + aLong); } }); } } Why is there no information output from the console after two seconds? 回答1: By default the timer operator is executed in a different Thread (in the computation thread pool) and your main thread is exited just after calling the subscribe and

Retrofit Call enqueue method or Rxjava

别等时光非礼了梦想. 提交于 2020-03-13 06:21:50
问题 As Retrofit docs represent Call enqueue method in Retrofit is : Asynchronously send the request and notify callback of its response or if an error occurred talking to the server, creating the request, or processing the response. and Rxjava according to this tutorial is : RxJava and RxAndroid libraries allow us to easily do async processing using principles of functional reactive programming it seems these two have the same approach. What is advantages and disadvantages of each? Which one is

EventBus/PubSub vs (reactive extensions) RX with respect to code clarity in a single threaded application

拥有回忆 提交于 2020-03-12 06:57:31
问题 Currently, I am using an EventBus/PubSub architecture/pattern with Scala (and JavaFX) to implement a simple note organizing app (sort of like an Evernote client with some added mind mapping functionality) and I have to say that I really like EventBus over the observer pattern. Here are some EventBus libraries : https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/wiki/EventBusExplained http://eventbus.org (currently seems to be down) this is the one I am using in my implementation. http://greenrobot

EventBus/PubSub vs (reactive extensions) RX with respect to code clarity in a single threaded application

跟風遠走 提交于 2020-03-12 06:57:08
问题 Currently, I am using an EventBus/PubSub architecture/pattern with Scala (and JavaFX) to implement a simple note organizing app (sort of like an Evernote client with some added mind mapping functionality) and I have to say that I really like EventBus over the observer pattern. Here are some EventBus libraries : https://code.google.com/p/guava-libraries/wiki/EventBusExplained http://eventbus.org (currently seems to be down) this is the one I am using in my implementation. http://greenrobot

Chaining method calls using RxJava

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2020-03-05 07:51:13
问题 Given two methods, both which returns a Single , what is the correct way, using Rx , to chain the two method calls together so that one method is called first, and the second once, and only if, the first completes successfully. Ideally, the second method will be able to access the value returned by the first. 回答1: Assuming your methods are like this: static Single<String> method1() { return Single.just("x"); } static Single<String> method2(String in) { return Single.just(in+"y"); } the