routing

Flask: serve assets without leading slash using url_for

醉酒当歌 提交于 2019-12-04 14:48:12
问题 I'm working on a Flask app that uses url_for to specify the route to some static assets (js, css, etc). Here's an example from one of the templates: <script src='{{ url_for('static', filename='js/search.js') }}'></script> When this gets rendered into html, the path looks like this: <script src='/static/js/search.js'></script> Is it possible to modify this behavior such that the leading slash is dropped from the rendered script path? The goal is to render the following: <script src='static/js

Angular JS: 2 applications on the same page, only 1 should affect browser's location

瘦欲@ 提交于 2019-12-04 14:23:12
I'm looking for a solution to host 2 Angular JS applications on a single page. The extra requirement is, only 1 of these applications should depend on/affect real URL. Here's the code: <!doctype html> <html> <head> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.0.2/angular.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var app1 = angular.module("app1", [], function($routeProvider) { $routeProvider .when("/1", { template: "<h1>app 1 page 1<

Can ASP.NET MVC routing and a classic ASP homepage (VBScript, not web forms) play together nicely?

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-12-04 14:00:50
We have a classic VBScript "default.asp" page in the root of our site. (This is a heavy, legacy page and converting it is not an option right now.) We also have a new ASP.NET MVC 2 application we want to host on the same site. Everything actually works great together! Except for one thing: requests to the root of the site (e.g., / ) get picked up by the MVC routing (which then wants to display the HomeController's Index action) instead of letting the default.asp page take the request! This is what I would like: http://www.example.com/ <- should execute the classic default.asp page, not /Home

ASP.NET MVC Routing two GUIDs

╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2019-12-04 13:52:03
问题 I have an action taking two GUIDs: public class MyActionController : Controller { //... public ActionResult MoveToTab(Guid param1, Guid param2) { //... } } I would like the following URI to map to the action: /myaction/movetotab/1/2 ...with 1 corresponding to param1 and 2 to param2. What will the route look like, and is it possible to map the arguments to parameters with a type of Guid? 回答1: Yes, it is possible to map your parameters to System.Guid routes.MapRoute( "MoveToTab", "{controller}/

Laravel 5.5 Multi Authentication Routing Issue

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2019-12-04 13:46:58
Trying to get Laravel multiple authentication to work using Doctrine instead of Eloquent. I've tried multiple things but keep getting stuck. I currently have two guards defined, two models, two login controllers, etc. If I enable either one or the other, they work. If I try both at the same time, only the default guard seems to work. When I try to access the other guard, I get redirected to the wrong login page. If I go to /login - works as expected If I go to /home (without being logged in) - redirected to /login as expected If I go to /register- works as expected If I go to /admin/login -

Setting up ASP.Net MVC 4 Routing with custom segment variables

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-12-04 13:46:20
问题 I just began working on an application with a couple areas (basic grid master / details type system..) I'm looking into taking advantage of the nice routing features in MVC (4 specifically) and I'm "just not getting it" I presume. Currently the only route defined is the basic one: routes.MapRoute("Default", "{controller}/{action}/{id}", new { controller = "Account", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } ); which is fine, it works with the areas we have defined, so I'm assuming it

Categories of controllers in MVC Routing? (Duplicate Controller names in separate Namespaces)

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-04 13:44:58
I'm looking for some examples or samples of routing for the following sort of scenario: The general example of doing things is: {controller}/{action}/{id} So in the scenario of doing a product search for a store you'd have: public class ProductsController: Controller { public ActionResult Search(string id) // id being the search string { ... } } Say you had a few stores to do this and you wanted that consistently, is there any way to then have: {category}/{controller}/{action}/{id} So that you could have a particular search for a particular store, but use a different search method for a

implement express controller class with typescript

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-04 13:44:57
问题 I'm doing an express app with typescript. The router code is: let user = new User(); router.get("/", user.test); the user class is export class User { test(req, res, next) { // this === undefined } } the problem is that the this object is undefined inside test method. Is there a better way to implement express routing? 回答1: You need to use the bind function to keep the scope of this when the method is invoked: let user = new User(); router.get("/", user.test.bind(user)); Or you can do that in

Create breadcrumb when navigating nested components (Angular 2)

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-12-04 13:43:51
问题 I am struggling with this :) The idea is to have a component and when navigate trough sub-views update the breadcrumb for example: <breadcrumb> Products / Category-C / My-Product </breadcrumb> Products -> Category-A -> Category-B -> Category-C |-> My-Product 回答1: May be this is not the best solution but you can use RoutesRecognized router event and traverse through event.state._root childrens: import {Injectable, EventEmitter} from '@angular/core'; import {Router, RoutesRecognized,

meteor iron-router and getting the names of all routes for the accounts-entry package

安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-04 13:41:01
The popular accounts-entry package has an iron-router related bug in it. I believe the later versions of iron-router changed to work better as middleware and so a call to Router.routes At line 87 of this file the following code is used: _.each Router.routes, (route)-> exclusions.push route.name # Change the fromWhere session variable when you leave a path Router.onStop -> # If the route is an entry route, no need to save it if (!_.contains(exclusions, Router.current().route?.getName())) Session.set('fromWhere', Router.current().path) Unfortunately it does not seems like doing an _.each on