roslyn

Sort and remove (unused) using statements Roslyn script/code? I'm looking for some .NET/Roslyn (compiler as service) code that can run through a project and sort and remove unused using statements. I believe this is possible with Roslyn? Can anyone point me to code that could do this rewrite? This is a feature in Visual Studio, but academically I think you would collect using statements from your SyntaxTree like this: var usings = syntaxTree.Root.DescendentNodes().Where(node is UsingDirectiveSyntax); ...and compare that to the namespaces resolved by the symbol table like this: private static

I'm generating a Greeter.dll using the Roslyn compiler. My problem occurs trying to load the DLL file. Here's the code: using System; using Roslyn.Compilers; using Roslyn.Compilers.CSharp; using System.IO; using System.Reflection; using System.Linq; namespace LoadingAClass { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { var syntaxTree = SyntaxTree.ParseCompilationUnit(@" class Greeter { static void Greet() { Console.WriteLine(""Hello, World""); } }"); var compilation = Compilation.Create("Greeter.dll", syntaxTrees: new[] { syntaxTree }, references: new[] { new AssemblyFileReference(typeof

In Visual Studio 2013, I used the Code Analysis window to provide reports to both the Development and Management teams. In Visual Studio 2015 Enterprise RTM, these errors have returned to the error window and I can no longer just see CA issues for a single project, or filter them by type. Is there a way to bring the Code Analysis window back? Visual Studio Code Analysis has been merged with Intellisense and can now be viewed from the Error window. When you select "Build+Intellisense" or "Intellisense" your code analysis warnings will show up there. You no longer need to build your solution to

We just found these in our code: public static class ObjectContextExtensions { public static T Find<T>(this ObjectSet<T> set, int id, params Expression<Func<T, object>>[] includes) where T : class { ... } public static T Find<T>(this ObjectSet<T> set, int id, params string[] includes) where T : class { ... } } As you can see, these have the same signature except for the params . And they're being used in several ways, one of them: DBContext.Users.Find(userid.Value); //userid being an int? (Nullable<int>) which, strangely enough to me, resolves to the first overload. Q1: Why doesn't this

Was C# compiler written in C++? Kent Boogaart Yes, but there are plans to write a C# compiler in C#, which I believe was discussed in this podcast . Yes. The Mono C# compiler is written in C#. Kakashi The .NET framework was written in Simple Managed C (SMC) History During the development of the .NET Framework, the class libraries were originally written using a managed code compiler system called Simple Managed C (SMC).In January 1999, Anders Hejlsberg formed a team to build a new language at the time called Cool, which stood for "C-like Object Oriented Language".[16] Microsoft had considered

C# Interactive seems a lot more powerful than the Immediate Window (at least it handles lambda expressions that are often used in LINQ - see Visual Studio debugging "quick watch" tool and lambda expressions ), but it looks like it can't be used as a replacement as it doesn't know about the debugger context. Is there a way to have access to the debugger context? I've seen Getting debugger context in F# interactive and it might require the same things, but maybe there are new/different things available. http://extendedimmediatewin.codeplex.com/ could be useful but looks quite dead, although