rfc

RFC Destination does not exist

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 00:52:01
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm trying to configure an application running in Tomcat 8.5 with Neo Cloud SDK 3.54.23 to connect to an RFC destination and run the following code: String destinationName = "RFCQueryEndpoint"; ErpConfigContext erpConfigContext = new ErpConfigContext(destinationName); ErpEndpoint endpoint = new ErpEndpoint(erpConfigContext); response.getWriter().write(new Gson().toJson(new DefaultFinancialTransactionService().getList() .execute(endpoint).getListOfSelectedTransactions())); I have tried multiple ways of configuring the RFC destination, but

RFC 3339 how make a dateTime from

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 00:48:01
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I'm trying to format a date passed from a google plus Api thats like the guide says in RFC 3339 format: PUBLISHED-> datetime-> The time at which this activity was initially published. Formatted as an RFC 3339 timestamp. So by php documentation i found that: DATE_RFC3339 Same as DATE_ATOM (since PHP 5.1.3) And that both format are something like: "Y-m-d\TH:i:sP" Actually the output of the Google api is something like: 2014-01-22T10:36:00.222Z When I'm trying to launch command like: $date = DateTime::createFromFormat("Y-m-d\TH:i:sP", $activity

rtp 实时传输协议

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 00:08:02
实时传输协议 ( Real-time Transport Protocol 或简写 RTP )是一个 网络传输协议 ,它是由IETF的多媒体传输工作小组1996年在RFC 1889中公布的。 国际电信联盟 ITU-T也发布了自己的RTP文档,作为H.225.0,但是后来当IETF发布了关于它的稳定的标准RFC后就被取消了。它作为 因特网 标准在RFC 3550(该文档的旧版本是RFC 1889)有详细说明。RFC 3551(STD 65,旧版本是RFC 1890)详细描述了使用最小控制的音频和视频会议。 RTP协议详细说明了在 互联网 上传递音频和视频的标准数据包格式。它一开始被设计为一个 多播 协议,但后来被用在很多 单播 应用中。RTP协议常用于 流媒体 系统(配合RTSP协议),视频会议和 一键通 (Push to Talk)系统(配合H.323或SIP),使它成为 IP电话 产业的技术基础。RTP协议和RTP控制协议 RTCP 一起使用,而且它是创建在 UDP协议 上的。 中文名 实时传输协议 外文名 Real-time Transport Protocol 简 称 RTP 类 型 概念 Ŀ¼ 1 特征 2 组成 3 使用 4 报文格式 5 RTCP概要 6 封包结构 特征 编辑 实时传输协议(RTP)为数据提供了具有实时特征的端对端传送服务,如在 组播 或 单播

RFC的远程调用-异步

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-02 23:47:01
接上篇RFC的远程调用-同步(https://www.cnblogs.com/BruceKing/p/11169930.html)。 TABLES:USR21. DATA:A TYPE USR21-PERSNUMBER, B TYPE SY-SYSID, C1 LIKE TABLE OF USR21 WITH HEADER LINE. DATA:MSG_TEXT(100) TYPE C. CALL FUNCTION 'ZTESTRFCKING001' DESTINATION 'QAS600' STARTING NEW TASK 'B1' "使用call function starting new task destination&&单独调试这一步时会进入目标系统的函数调式界面 PERFORMING RETURN_USER ON END OF TASK"当目标系统调试完后会进入此子例程,子例程里不能有subimt,commit work等 EXPORTING ZBNAME = '0201010001' EXCEPTIONS COMMUNICATION_FAILURE = 1 MESSAGE MSG_TEXT SYSTEM_FAILURE = 2 MESSAGE MSG_TEXT. IF SY-SUBRC = 0. WRITE:'wait'. ELSE. WRITE MSG_TEXT.

python作业之sklearn

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-02 22:54:36
题目: 1 Create a classification dataset (n samples 1000, n features 10) 2 Split the dataset using 10-fold cross validation 3 Train the algorithms GaussianNB SVC (possible C values [1e-02, 1e-01, 1e00, 1e01, 1e02], RBF kernel) RandomForestClassifier (possible n estimators values [10, 100, 1000]) 4 Evaluate the cross-validated performance Accuracy F1-score AUC ROC 5 Write a short report summarizing the methodology and the results from sklearn import datasets,cross_validation from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB from sklearn.svm import SVC from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

.NET利用RFC查询SAP数据

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-02 22:06:11
为黄朴整理!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 在NuGet 添加 sapnco 一个简单的SAPCommand,方法 GetDataTableFromRFCTable 复制于 https://www.cnblogs.com/jamin/p/3374139.html using System ; using System . Collections . Generic ; using System . Text ; using SAP . Middleware . Connector ; using System . Data ; using System . Linq ; namespace Blog . Core . Business . RFC { /// <summary> /// SAPCommand /// </summary> public static class SAPCommand { /// <summary> /// 获取连接SAP参数 /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> private static RfcConfigParameters GetRfcConfigParameters () { RfcConfigParameters pairs = new RfcConfigParameters (); pairs

SMTP: \r\n\r (without second \n) as double newline

安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-02 02:50:00
问题 I have SMTP parser that works mostly fine. There is a problem when receiving traffic from third party software that sends double newlines as "\r\n\r" (without the second "\n"). Currently such connections are terminated as non-compliant SMTP. Can somebody explain what exactly RFC says about such "funny" double newlines? Can I asume that software that sends data like that is doing something really wrong? 回答1: RFC2821. Section 2.3.7: SMTP commands and, unless altered by a service extension,

01-DNS域名解析服务

怎甘沉沦 提交于 2019-12-02 02:20:29
DNS域名解析服务 DNS域名解析服务 DNS服务 DNS的实现原理 实战项目1:在企业内部搭建一台域名解析服务器DNS正反解析 实战项目2:在企业内部搭建两台域名解析服务器做DNS主辅同步 排错记录 配置文件详细解析 - 总结 课程要求 1. 在企业内部搭建一台域名解析服务器DNS正反解析 2. 在企业内部搭建两台域名解析服务器做DNS主辅同步 DNS服务 全称是domain name server域名解析服务。 我们知道每个联网的计算机都有一个ip地址吧?Ip地址是用来做什么的呢?Ip地址是用来和互联网上别的机器进行通讯的。 但是ip地址很难记吧?一两个ip地址可能还好,但是,我们每天要访问的网页不仅仅只有一两个吧? 我们记得都是什么呢?www.baidu.com. www.sina.com。我们记住的其实都是字符,都是域名。 就像我们的电话号码,很难记,于是我们把电话号码存到手机里,给他起个昵称或者直接输入人名对吧,把电话号码对应成人名吧? 然后打电话的时候就直接找到这个人名就好了。 所以我们系统也是一样,会把ip地址对应成一个主机名。在我们系统里有这么一个文件,就是专门用来做对应关系的, 这个文件叫 /etc/hosts/ ,我们可以打开来看一下,一条记录一行,行里面就是主机名和ip地址,当然一个ip地址可以对应多个 主机名,就像人有很多的昵称一样。

解决Unable to connect to archive.ubuntu.com问题

北慕城南 提交于 2019-12-01 16:58:25
环境:ubuntu18.04,apt source使用阿里源,通过 apt-get 安装模块或者 update 的时候出现,提示错误: 解决方法: sudo vim / etc / gai . conf 找到 # precedence # Add another rule to the RFC 3484 precedence table. See section 2.1 # and 10.3 in RFC 3484. The default is: # #precedence ::1/128 50 #precedence ::/0 40 #precedence 2002::/16 30 #precedence ::/96 20 #precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 10 # # For sites which prefer IPv4 connections change the last line to # # 此处解开下行注释 #precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100 删除 #precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100 之前的 # 号即可。 解释:只使用ipv4,参考: https://www.iteye.com/blog/jiajianchao-gmail-com-1597253 来源: https://www.cnblogs

How does RFC 2854 obsolete RFC 1867?

守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-12-01 09:48:35
问题 How (or why) does 2584 "obsolete" 1867? This may simply come down to my not understanding how to read RFCs, but from what I can discern, 1867 describes how file uploading works with HTML forms and 2584 is about a MIME type not used in HTML forms. Two completely different things? 回答1: RFC 2584 marks the end of the Internet Engineering Task Force's involvement in the HTML specification. Further work was continued by the World Wide Web Consortium. RFC 2584 reads: The IETF HTML working group