replication

How do you retrieve the replication factor info in Hdfs files?

a 夏天 提交于 2019-12-05 03:38:19
I have set the replication factor for my file as follows: hadoop fs -D dfs.replication=5 -copyFromLocal file.txt /user/xxxx When a NameNode restarts, it makes sure under-replicated blocks are replicated. Hence the replication info for the file is stored (possibly in nameNode ). How can I get that information? Try to use command hadoop fs -stat %r /path/to/file , it should print the replication factor. You can run following command to get replication factor, hadoop fs -ls /user/xxxx The second column in the output signify replication factor for the file and for the folder it shows - , as shown

Methods to Verify Cassandra Node Sync

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2019-12-05 03:08:19
I have a 3 node Cassandra cluster with replication factor of 2. Because one of the nodes has been replaced with a new one. And I have used "nodetool repair" to repair all the keyspaces. But don't know how to verify that all the keyspaces are synced. Before, Just found this article would help, but a little. Cassandra Data Replication problem Is there any way to verify the keyspaces with replication factor > 1 in Cassandra? Thanks a lot. stephon First, if you run nodetool repair again and very little data is transferred (assuming all nodes have been up since the last time you ran), you know that

Session replication across JVMs in WebSphere

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-05 00:47:51
问题 We have an infrastructure set up where in the webservers are clustered and the application servers are not. The webservers route the request to the application servers based on round-robin policy. In this scenario, the session data available in one application server is not available in the other application server. Is there anyway by which the session data from first application server can be made available in the second application ? The two application servers are physically separate boxes

Promote secondary to primary from secondary node

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-05 00:16:19
问题 My test system (due to lack of resources) has a dual mongodb replicaset. There is no arbiter. During some system changes one of the servers got put out of action and will not be coming back. This server happened to host the primary mongo node. This left the only other member of the set as a secondary. I know I should have had at least three nodes for the cluster (our prod setup does). Is there a way I can make the primary that is now offline to step down? I haven't been able to change any of

MongoDB replica heartbeat request time exceeded

泄露秘密 提交于 2019-12-05 00:11:32
问题 I have replica set (hosted on amazon) which has: primary secondary arbiter All of them are version 3.2.6 and this replica is making one shard in my sharded cluster (if that is important although I think it is not). When I type rs.status() on primary it says that cannot reach secondary (the same thing is on arbiter): { "_id" : 1, "name" : "secondary-ip:27017", "health" : 0, "state" : 8, "stateStr" : "(not reachable/healthy)", "uptime" : 0, "optime" : { "ts" : Timestamp(0, 0), "t" : NumberLong(

SQL Server 2000/2005 identity column + replication

爱⌒轻易说出口 提交于 2019-12-04 19:42:50
I have looked at some resources already and just want to clarify and get an opinion. First of all to totally avoid any problems we could just not bother using identity columns as primary keys instead have them generated ourselves and just have those values replicated both ways presuming they are always unique at any time of creation. For the purposes of this question I am talking about 2 or more way replication to solve global access issues and we do have identity columns. Now we are setting up transactional replication and both databases should replicate to each other. As I understand it you

MySQL Remote Connection (Replication)

我们两清 提交于 2019-12-04 19:32:17
I have the following topology. One Ubuntu 16.04. Instance on the Amazon AWS where my global MySQL Server is running. I want to use this Server as a Slave (Multi-Source Replication) for many local Master (Windows Machines MySQL Server). For Testing Reasons I`ve Managed to make this running on one local Machine (with three different MySQL Server Running). But now I want to make this Replication work on the mentioned global Server with the local ones. But it fails on the attempt to connect from the EC2 ubuntu Instance to the local Windows MySQL Server. When I try to connect from my EC2 Instance

CouchDB replication strategy with dynamic groups of users

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-12-04 17:43:20
This is the situation: We have a series of users who share some documents. The documents they can share might change throughout the day, so can the documents themselves (changes and deletions). The users can change some information on the documents. E.g. Users | Documents A | X A | Y A | Z B | X B | Z C | Y Possible groups: A+C, A+B The server on CouchDB is a replica of a SQL Server DB with this data, an ETL takes care of managing changes on CouchDB. However, the CouchDB database is replicated on each user phone via PouchDB. The goal: To replicate changes and deletions accordingly. What we've

Read/Write splits using Zend_Db

杀马特。学长 韩版系。学妹 提交于 2019-12-04 17:09:22
I have a PHP application that has grown in size. The database used to be on a single master but we intend to change that with a fairly standard master/slave replication for performance and HA. Since this app is read-heavy I would like to have the reads delegated to the slave replicas and writes going to the master. The app is based on Zend Framework 1.1.10 and uses Zend_Db. What would be my best strategy for getting this app to split reads and writes to the DB without refactoring the code too much? (I realize there would probably be some refactoring involved here). P.S: I have looked at MySQL

How do I add a new replicated table to a SQL Server 2005 DB that is in merge replication?

自作多情 提交于 2019-12-04 16:11:08
We have merge replication set up over a distributed environment (50 to 1500km between offices) for a SQL Server 2005 database of about 350Gb. We now need to add a couple of new tables that must also be in replication, but without pushing the new snapshot to all the subscribers. Is this possible, and if so, what would be the best way to go about doing this? sp_addmergearticle - Adds an article to an existing merge publication. This stored procedure is executed at the Publisher on the publication database. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms174329.aspx 来源: https://stackoverflow.com