python-multiprocessing

multiprocessing.Value doesn't store float correctly

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-12-02 09:04:49
问题 I try to asign a float to the multiprocessing.Value shared ctype as follows: import multiprocessing import random test_float = multiprocessing.Value('f', 0) i = random.randint(1,10000)/(random.randint(1,10000)) test_float.value = i print("i: type = {}, value = {}".format(type(i), i)) print("test_float: type = {}, value = {}".format(type(test_float.value), test_float.value)) print("i == test_float: {}".format(i == test_float.value)) However, the float stored in multiprocessing.Value is != the

Where to call join() when multiprocessing

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-12-02 07:27:37
When using multiprocessing in Python, I usually see examples where the join() function is called in a separate loop to where each process was actually created. For example, this: processes = [] for i in range(10): p = Process(target=my_func) processes.append(p) p.start() for p in processes: p.join() is more common than this: processes = [] for i in range(10): p = Process(target=my_func) processes.append(p) p.start() p.join() But from my understanding of join() , it just tells the script not to exit until that process has finished. Therefore, it shouldn't matter when join() is called. So why is

AttributeError 'DupFd' in 'multiprocessing.resource_sharer' | Python multiprocessing + threading

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-12-02 05:10:59
I'm trying to communicate between multiple threading.Thread (s) doing I/O-bound tasks and multiple multiprocessing.Process (es) doing CPU-bound tasks. Whenever a thread finds work for a process, it will be put on a multiprocessing.Queue , together with the sending end of a multiprocessing.Pipe(duplex=False) . The processes then do their part and send results back to the threads via the Pipe. This procedure seems to work in roughly 70% of the cases, the other 30% I receive an AttributeError: Can't get attribute 'DupFd' on <module 'multiprocessing.resource_sharer' from '/usr/lib/python3.5

Missing lines when writing file with multiprocessing Lock Python

半世苍凉 提交于 2019-12-02 04:00:13
This is my code: from multiprocessing import Pool, Lock from datetime import datetime as dt console_out = "/STDOUT/Console.out" chunksize = 50 lock = Lock() def writer(message): lock.acquire() with open(console_out, 'a') as out: out.write(message) out.flush() lock.release() def conf_wrapper(state): import ProcessingModule as procs import sqlalchemy as sal stcd, nrows = state engine = sal.create_engine('postgresql://foo:bar@localhost:5432/schema') writer("State {s} started at: {n}" "\n".format(s=str(stcd).zfill(2), n=dt.now())) with engine.connect() as conn, conn.begin(): procs.processor(conn,

Multiprocessing inside a child thread

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-02 00:16:40
I was learning about multi-processing and multi-threading. From what I understand, threads run on the same core, so I was wondering if I create multiple processes inside a child thread will they be limited to that single core too? I'm using python, so this is a question about that specific language but I would like to know if it is the same thing with other languages? I'm not a pyhton expert but I expect this is like in other languages, because it's an OS feature in general. Process A process is executed by the OS and owns one thread which will be executed. This is in general your programm.

python multiprocessing Process is killed by http request if ipdb is imported

流过昼夜 提交于 2019-12-01 23:41:48
问题 It seems simply importing ipdb when making an http request wrapped in a multiprocessing Process instance causes the program to exit with no errors or messages. The following script behaves very strangely: from multiprocessing import Process import requests import ipdb def spawn(): print("before") r = requests.get("http://wtfismyip.com") print("after") Process(target=spawn).start() If you run this in terminal the output is simply before and you are back at your prompt. If you comment out

Starmap combined with tqdm?

放肆的年华 提交于 2019-12-01 18:33:36
问题 I am doing some parallel processing, as follows: with mp.Pool(8) as tmpPool: results = tmpPool.starmap(my_function, inputs) where inputs look like: [(1,0.2312),(5,0.52) ...] i.e., tuples of an int and a float. The code runs nicely, yet I cannot seem to wrap it around a loading bar (tqdm), such as can be done with e.g., imap method as follows: tqdm.tqdm(mp.imap(some_function,some_inputs)) Can this be done for starmap also? Thanks! 回答1: It's not possible with starmap() , but it's possible with

Starmap combined with tqdm?

僤鯓⒐⒋嵵緔 提交于 2019-12-01 18:24:41
I am doing some parallel processing, as follows: with mp.Pool(8) as tmpPool: results = tmpPool.starmap(my_function, inputs) where inputs look like: [(1,0.2312),(5,0.52) ...] i.e., tuples of an int and a float. The code runs nicely, yet I cannot seem to wrap it around a loading bar (tqdm), such as can be done with e.g., imap method as follows: tqdm.tqdm(mp.imap(some_function,some_inputs)) Can this be done for starmap also? Thanks! It's not possible with starmap() , but it's possible with a patch adding Pool.istarmap() . It's based on the code for imap() . All you have to do, is create the

Pickle exception for cv2.Boost when using multiprocessing

青春壹個敷衍的年華 提交于 2019-12-01 13:17:15
I'm working on project named "Faciel Actions Units Detection" I'm using python2.7 and opencv 2.4 The error: pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <type 'cv2.Boost'>: it's not the same object as cv2.Boost A partial traceback, transcribed from a screenshot : Loading classifier for action unit 27 Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python27\audetect-master\audetect-interactive.py", line 59, in <module> main() File "C:\Python27\audetect-master\audetect-interactive.py", line 18, in main active_aus = detector.detect() File "C:\Python27\audetect-master\detect.py", line 67, in detect initial

Pickle exception for cv2.Boost when using multiprocessing

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-12-01 11:04:13
问题 I'm working on project named "Faciel Actions Units Detection" I'm using python2.7 and opencv 2.4 The error: pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <type 'cv2.Boost'>: it's not the same object as cv2.Boost A partial traceback, transcribed from a screenshot: Loading classifier for action unit 27 Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python27\audetect-master\audetect-interactive.py", line 59, in <module> main() File "C:\Python27\audetect-master\audetect-interactive.py", line 18, in main active