python-multiprocessing

Where is the memory leak? How to timeout threads during multiprocessing in python?

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-06 19:46:19
问题 It is unclear how to properly timeout workers of joblib's Parallel in python. Others have had similar questions here, here, here and here. In my example I am utilizing a pool of 50 joblib workers with threading backend. Parallel Call (threading): output = Parallel(n_jobs=50, backend = 'threading') (delayed(get_output)(INPUT) for INPUT in list) Here, Parallel hangs without errors as soon as len(list) <= n_jobs but only when n_jobs => -1 . In order to circumvent this issue, people give

Multiprocess in python uses only one process

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-12-06 18:51:39
I am trying to learn multiprocessing with python. I wrote a simple code that should feed each process with 1000 lines from a txt input file. My main function reads a line, splits it and then performs some very simple operations with the elements in the string. Eventually the results should be written in an output file. When I run it, 4 processes are correctly spawned, but only one process is actually running with minimal CPU. As a result the code is very slow and defies the purpose to use multiprocessing in the first place. I think I don't have a global list problem like in this question (

Share object state across processes?

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2019-12-06 15:58:09
In the code below, how do I make the Starter object be able to read gen.vals ? It seems like a different object gets created, whose state gets updated, but Starter never knows about it. Also, how would the solution apply for self.vals being a dictionary, or any other kind of object? import multiprocessing import time class Generator(multiprocessing.Process): def __init__(self): self.vals = [] super(Generator, self).__init__() def run(self): i = 0 while True: time.sleep(1) self.vals.append(i) print 'In Generator ', self.vals # prints growing list i += 1 class Starter(): def do_stuff(self): gen

Does partial fit runs in parallel in sklearn.decomposition.IncrementalPCA?

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-06 15:46:12
I've followed Imanol Luengo 's answer to build a partial fit and transform for sklearn.decomposition.IncrementalPCA . But for some reason, it looks like (from htop) it uses all CPU cores at maximum. I could find neither n_jobs parameter nor anything related to multiprocessing. My question is: if this is default behavior of these functions how can I set the number of CPU's and where can I find information about it? If not, obviously I am doing something wrong in previous sections of my code. PS: I need to limit the number of CPU cores because using all cores in a server causing a lot of trouble

Python multiprocessing and Manager

我们两清 提交于 2019-12-06 13:19:26
I am using Python's multiprocessing to create a parallel application. Processes need to share some data, for which I use a Manager . However, I have some common functions which processes need to call and which need to access the data stored by the Manager object. My question is whether I can avoid needing to pass the Manager instance to these common functions as an argument and rather use it like a global. In other words, consider the following code: import multiprocessing as mp manager = mp.Manager() global_dict = manager.dict(a=[0]) def add(): global_dict['a'] += [global_dict['a'][-1]+1] def

Python multiprocessing throws error with argparse and pyinstaller

匆匆过客 提交于 2019-12-06 11:52:03
问题 In my project, I'm using argprse to pass arguments and somewhere in script I'm using multiprocessing to do rest of the calculations. Script is working fine if I call it from command prompt for ex. " python complete_script.py --arg1=xy --arg2=yz " . But after converting it to exe using Pyinstaller using command "pyinstaller --onefile complete_script.py" it throws error " error: unrecognized arguments: --multiprocessing-fork 1448" Any suggestions how could I make this work. Or any other

multiprocessing.pool.MaybeEncodingError: Error sending result: Reason: 'TypeError(“cannot serialize '_io.BufferedReader' object”,)'

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-06 11:44:31
问题 I get the following error: multiprocessing.pool.MaybeEncodingError: Error sending result: '<multiprocessing.pool.ExceptionWithTraceback object at 0x7f758760d6a0>'. Reason: 'TypeError("cannot serialize '_io.BufferedReader' object",)' When running this code: from operator import itemgetter from multiprocessing import Pool import wget def f(args): print(args[1]) wget.download(args[1], "tests/" + target + '/' + str(args[0]), bar=None) if __name__ == "__main__": a = Pool(2) a.map(f, list(enumerate

Python tornado with multi-process

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-12-06 11:26:07
问题 I found how to execute tornado with multi-process. server = HTTPServer(app) server.bind(8888) server.start(0) #Forks multiple sub-processes IOLoop.current().start() In this situation is there any way to share resource over processes? and It seems using the same port over processes. Does tornado balance the load itself for each process? If so, how does it do? 回答1: In general, when using multi-process mode the processes only communicate via external services: databases, cache servers, message

Python Pyserial read data form multiple serial ports at same time

百般思念 提交于 2019-12-06 10:01:37
问题 I'm trying to read out multiple serial ports at the same time with Python 2.7 and PySerial. Features should be: in the main program I get all open serial ports, open them and append the serial object to serialobjects I want to read each serial port data in one subprocess for parallelization The big problem is: how do I pass the serial port object to the subprocess? OR: Does another (and maybe better) solution exist to this? (Maybe this: How do I apply twisted serial ports to my problem?) EDIT

Multiprocessing: why is a numpy array shared with the child processes, while a list is copied?

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-06 09:35:42
问题 I used this script (see code at the end) to assess whether a global object is shared or copied when the parent process is forked. Briefly, the script creates a global data object, and the child processes iterate over data . The script also monitors the memory usage to assess whether the object was copied in the child processes. Here are the results: data = np.ones((N,N)) . Operation in the child process: data.sum() . Result: data is shared (no copy) data = list(range(pow(10, 8))) . Operation