pool

How to replace default hikari cp to tomcat pool on spring boot 2.0

谁都会走 提交于 2019-12-04 11:06:30
问题 I have migrated spring boot application to 2.0 and found out some problems with hikari connection pool. When I am fetching database data this results to hikari cp timeout ie. connection is not available. I don't know why when in the previous version this worked correctly. Therefore I tried to use tomcat pool with this config in application.yml but it did not work (in correct YAML formatting). spring.datasource.type=org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSource My pom.xml has these dependencies

Difference between pool and cluster

北城以北 提交于 2019-12-04 10:48:55
问题 From a purest perspective, they kind of feel like identical concepts. Both manage sets of reosurces/nodes and control their access from or by external components. With a pool, you borrow and return these resources/nodes to and from the pool. With a cluster, you have a load balancer sitting in front of the resources/nodes and you hit the load balancer with a request. In both cases you have absolutely no control over which resource/node your request/borrow gets mapped to. So I pose the question

Optimizing multiprocessing.Pool with expensive initialization

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2019-12-04 09:19:12
Here is a complete simple working example import multiprocessing as mp import time import random class Foo: def __init__(self): # some expensive set up function in the real code self.x = 2 print('initializing') def run(self, y): time.sleep(random.random() / 10.) return self.x + y def f(y): foo = Foo() return foo.run(y) def main(): pool = mp.Pool(4) for result in pool.map(f, range(10)): print(result) pool.close() pool.join() if __name__ == '__main__': main() How can I modify it so Foo is only initialized once by each worker, not every task? Basically I want the init called 4 times, not 10. I am

urllib3 connectionpool - Connection pool is full, discarding connection

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-12-04 04:03:33
问题 does seeing the urllib3.connectionpool WARNING - Connection pool is full, discarding connection mean that I am effectively loosing data (because of lost connection) OR Does it mean that connection is dropped (because pool is full); however, the same connection will be re-tried later on when connection pool becomes available? 回答1: Does it mean that connection is dropped (because pool is full); however, the same connection will be re-tried later on when connection pool becomes available? ^ This

Thread Pool vs Many Individual Threads

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-12-04 03:59:53
I'm in the middle of a problem where I am unable decide which solution to take. The problem is a bit unique. Lets put it this way, i am receiving data from the network continuously (2 to 4 times per second). Now each data belongs to a different, lets say, group. Now, lets call these groups, group1, group2 and so on. Each group has a dedicated job queue where data from the network is filtered and added to its corresponding group for processing. At first I created a dedicated thread per group which would take data from the job queue, process it and then goes to blocking state (using Linked

python prime crunching: processing pool is slower?

依然范特西╮ 提交于 2019-12-04 03:22:36
So I've been messing around with python's multiprocessing lib for the last few days and I really like the processing pool. It's easy to implement and I can visualize a lot of uses. I've done a couple of projects I've heard about before to familiarize myself with it and recently finished a program that brute forces games of hangman. Anywho, I was doing an execution time compairison of summing all the prime numbers between 1 million and 2 million both single threaded and through a processing pool. Now, for the hangman cruncher, putting the games in a processing pool improved execution time by

Mulitprocess Pools with different functions

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-03 22:56:58
Most examples of the Multiprocess Worker Pools execute a single function in different processes, f.e. def foo(args): pass if __name__ == '__main__': pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=30) res=pool.map_async(foo,args) Is there a way to handle two different and independent functions within the pool? So that you could assign f.e. 15 processes for foo() and 15 processes for bar() or is a pool bounded to a single function? Or du you have to create different processes for different functions manually with p = Process(target=foo, args=(whatever,)) q = Process(target=bar, args=(whatever,)) q.start(

Python multiprocessing Pool.apply_async with shared variables (Value)

大憨熊 提交于 2019-12-03 21:13:06
For my college project I am trying to develop a python based traffic generator.I have created 2 CentOS machines on vmware and I am using 1 as my client and 1 as my server machine. I have used IP aliasing technique to increase number of clients and severs using just single client/server machine. Upto now I have created 50 IP alias on my client machine and 10 IP alias on my server machine. I am also using multiprocessing module to generate traffic concurrently from all 50 clients to all 10 servers. I have also developed few profiles(1kb,10kb,50kb,100kb,500kb,1mb) on my server(in /var/www/html

Pool within a Class in Python

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-03 19:56:37
问题 I would like to use Pool within a class, but there seems to be a problem. My code is long, I created a small-demo variant to illustrated the problem. It would be great if you can give me a variant of the code below that works. from multiprocessing import Pool class SeriesInstance(object): def __init__(self): self.numbers = [1,2,3] def F(self, x): return x * x def run(self): p = Pool() print p.map(self.F, self.numbers) ins = SeriesInstance() ins.run() Outputs: Exception in thread Thread-2:

Gevent pool with nested web requests

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-12-03 16:32:26
I try to organize pool with maximum 10 concurrent downloads. The function should download base url, then parser all urls on this page and download each of them, but OVERALL number of concurrent downloads should not exceed 10. from lxml import etree import gevent from gevent import monkey, pool import requests monkey.patch_all() urls = [ 'http://www.google.com', 'http://www.yandex.ru', 'http://www.python.org', 'http://stackoverflow.com', # ... another 100 urls ] LINKS_ON_PAGE=[] POOL = pool.Pool(10) def parse_urls(page): html = etree.HTML(page) if html: links = [link for link in html.xpath("//a