platform

Java Desktop application framework [closed]

社会主义新天地 提交于 2019-12-02 19:14:57
I am working on designing and building a desktop application. I am thinking about using eclipse or netbeans for the base of this application. However, I have never built on either of these platforms. I am personally leaning to using netbeans because it seams like that platform is an easer learning curve. But, I wanted to ask people that have actually build on these platforms before which one is easier to use? My personal definition of easer is as follows: Easy to get started with Consistent and logical API Good documentation Easy to build and deploy Thanks very much, Josh I can't say enough

Is Django Book platform available? [closed]

Deadly 提交于 2019-12-02 16:48:14
The Django Book has a neat content publishing template. Anyone knows if it's available for public use? Alternatively, what Django sources would you recommend as an easy to use, out of the box CMS? According to this post on the mailing list, the source hasn't been released, and it doesn't look like it will be. I'd be interested in seeing the code as well. All we know is that it uses the YUI / extjs comment system. Based on that mailing list post it sounds like the code the Django site uses is from a BSD licensed version of the code, so perhaps you could use that javascript as a starting point.

Change target to x86 in VS2010

≡放荡痞女 提交于 2019-12-02 03:14:36
问题 I have a VS2010 solution with several projects in it. These projects are winforms apps and libraries. Now I MUST change platform for all projects to X86 from any CPU, but I can not do it, in some of my projects it stays 'Any CPU'. In these cases list contains only 'Any CPU'. It is impossible to change it. What could be the reason of it? How should I fix it? I read some wild solutions, e.g. open sln file in text editor and replace any cpu strings to X86 etc, but I hope there is a more

PlatformNotSupportedException Using .NET Speech Recognition

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-02 00:26:00
问题 So I'm trying voice recognition for C#, I'm using System.Speech.Recognition, and, I was searching around on the internet, trying out several pieces of code for some basic speech recognition, the best one I could find was this: using System; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; using System.Speech.Recognition; namespace SpeechRecognition { public partial class MainForm : Form { SpeechRecognitionEngine recognitionEngine; public MainForm() { InitializeComponent(); Initialize(); }

PlatformNotSupportedException Using .NET Speech Recognition

廉价感情. 提交于 2019-12-01 20:32:52
So I'm trying voice recognition for C#, I'm using System.Speech.Recognition, and, I was searching around on the internet, trying out several pieces of code for some basic speech recognition, the best one I could find was this: using System; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; using System.Speech.Recognition; namespace SpeechRecognition { public partial class MainForm : Form { SpeechRecognitionEngine recognitionEngine; public MainForm() { InitializeComponent(); Initialize(); } private void Initialize() { recognitionEngine = new SpeechRecognitionEngine(); recognitionEngine

Target platform/processor at compile time

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-12-01 04:02:40
Is there a #define in C# that allows me to know, at compile time, if I'm compiling for x86 (Win32) or x64 (Win64)? By default there is no way to do this. The reason is that C# code is not designed to target a particular platform as it runs on the CLR. It is possible to hand roll this though. You can use the project configuration settings in Visual Studio to define your own constants. Or if you want it a little more streamline you can edit the .csproj yourself and hand roll some more configurations which have various defines. For instance you can make your project file look like the following.

Target platform/processor at compile time

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-12-01 01:55:58
问题 Is there a #define in C# that allows me to know, at compile time, if I'm compiling for x86 (Win32) or x64 (Win64)? 回答1: By default there is no way to do this. The reason is that C# code is not designed to target a particular platform as it runs on the CLR. It is possible to hand roll this though. You can use the project configuration settings in Visual Studio to define your own constants. Or if you want it a little more streamline you can edit the .csproj yourself and hand roll some more

What is the difference between a platform and a framework? [closed]

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2019-11-30 09:53:08
There are a couple of topics on Stack Overflow and posts on the web addressing this question: what is the difference between a framework and a platform What is the difference between framework, platform and technology? What's the different between Framework and Platform? Is nodejs both framework and platform? How about V8? However, none of them really help me understand the actual differences between a framework and a platform as I conceive of them. Examples of what I mean by: Framework: Rails, Django or Laravel. Platform: Node.JS or Meteor What exactly sets apart a framework from a platform

why is Android API level 9 obsolete?

我是研究僧i 提交于 2019-11-30 08:23:48
问题 Android version 2.3 - 2.3.2 (API 9) are declared as obsolete, and according to Android Market statistics, are very rare (0.5% of market users). The question is: Why is API 9 declared obsolete and more importantly, is there any reason why should I not use it? I've been using API 9 and see no problems with it... am I missing something? Better not fix it if it's not broken, right? EDIT: Clarification: If I would update my applications' API from 9 to 10, what would be the benefits? I can only see

Why is int typically 32 bit on 64 bit compilers?

守給你的承諾、 提交于 2019-11-30 01:26:53
Why is int typically 32 bit on 64 bit compilers? When I was starting programming, I've been taught int is typically the same width as the underlying architecture. And I agree that this also makes sense, I find it logical for a unspecified width integer to be as wide as the underlying platform (unless we are talking 8 or 16 bit machines, where such a small range for int will be barely applicable). Later on I learned int is typically 32 bit on most 64 bit platforms. So I wonder what is the reason for this. For storing data I would prefer an explicitly specified width of the data type, so this