parentheses

parsing nested parentheses in python, grab content by level

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-11-26 16:37:20
问题 Apparently this problem comes up fairly often, after reading Regular expression to detect semi-colon terminated C++ for & while loops and thinking about the problem for a while, i wrote a function to return the content contained inside an arbitrary number of nested () The function could easily be extended to any regular expression object, posting here for your thoughts and considerations. any refactoring advice would be appreciated (note, i'm new to python still, and didn't feel like figuring

Advanced JavaScript: Why is this function wrapped in parentheses? [duplicate]

烂漫一生 提交于 2019-11-26 15:37:38
Possible Duplicate: What is the (function() { } )() construct in JavaScript? I came across this bit of JavaScript code, but I have no idea what to make out of it. Why do I get "1" when I run this code? What is this strange little appendix of (1) and why is the function wrapped in parentheses? (function(x){ delete x; return x; })(1); Howard There are a few things going on here. First is the immediately invoked function expression (IIFE) pattern: (function() { // Some code })(); This provides a way to execute some JavaScript code in its own scope. It's usually used so that any variables created

PHP is confused when adding and concatenating

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2019-11-26 14:44:47
I have the following code: <?php $a = 1; $b = 2; echo "sum: " . $a + $b; echo "sum: " . ($a + $b); ?> When I execute my code I get: 2 sum: 3 Why does it fail to print the string "sum:" in the first echo? It seems to be fine when the addition is enclosed in parentheses. Is this weird behaviour anywhere documented? mgibsonbr Both operators the addition + operator and the concatenation . operator have the same operator precedence , but since they are left associative they get evaluated like the following: echo (("sum:" . $a) + $b); echo ("sum:" . ($a + $b)); So your first line does the

What do the parentheses around a function name mean?

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-26 12:20:01
问题 In one of my project source files, I found this C function definition: int (foo) (int *bar) { return foo (bar); } Note: there is no asterisk next to foo , so it\'s not a function pointer. Or is it? What is going on here with the recursive call? 回答1: In the absence of any preprocessor stuff going on, foo 's signature is equivalent to int foo (int *bar) The only context in which I've seen people putting seemingly unnecessary parentheses around function names is when there are both a function

List of all unicode&#39;s open/close brackets?

你。 提交于 2019-11-26 11:49:41
问题 What is a list of every unicode bracket-like characters (including, for example: {}[]()<> )? What is a good way to search for unicode characters? 回答1: There is a plain-text database of information about every Unicode character available from the Unicode Consortium; the format is described in Unicode Annex #44. The primary information is contained in UnicodeData.txt. Open and close punctuation characters are denoted with Ps (punctuation start) and Pe (punctuation end) in the General_Category

Remove Text Between Parentheses PHP

旧街凉风 提交于 2019-11-26 11:47:04
I'm just wondering how I could remove the text between a set of parentheses and the parentheses themselves in php. Example : ABC (Test1) I would like it to delete (Test1) and only leave ABC Thanks $string = "ABC (Test1)"; echo preg_replace("/\([^)]+\)/","",$string); // 'ABC ' preg_replace is a perl-based regular expression replace routine. What this script does is matches all occurrences of a opening parenthesis, followed by any number of characters not a closing parenthesis, and again followed by a closing parenthesis, and then deletes them: Regular expression breakdown: / - opening delimiter

When to use parenthesis in Scala infix notation

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2019-11-26 08:26:06
问题 When programming in Scala, I do more and more functional stuff. However, when using infix notation it is hard to tell when you need parenthesis and when you don\'t. For example the following piece of code: def caesar(k:Int)(c:Char) = c match { case c if c isLower => (\'a\'+((c-\'a\'+k)%26)).toChar case c if c isUpper => (\'A\'+((c-\'A\'+k)%26)).toChar case _ => c } def encrypt(file:String,k:Int) = (fromFile(file) mkString) map caesar(k)_ The (fromFile(file) mkString) needs parenthesis in

When do extra parentheses have an effect, other than on operator precedence?

为君一笑 提交于 2019-11-26 06:58:20
问题 Parentheses in C++ are used in many places: e.g. in function calls and grouping expressions to override operator precedence. Apart from illegal extra parentheses (such as around function call argument lists), a general -but not absolute- rule of C++ is that extra parentheses never hurt : 5.1 Primary expressions [expr.prim] 5.1.1 General [expr.prim.general] 6 A parenthesized expression is a primary expression whose type and value are identical to those of the enclosed expression. The presence

Ruby block and unparenthesized arguments

两盒软妹~` 提交于 2019-11-26 05:26:48
I extracted simple example: require 'pp' x = 1..3 pp x.map do |i| {:value => i, :double => (i*2)} end pp x.map { |i| {:value => i, :double => (i*2)} } pp(x.map do |i| {:value => i, :double => (i*2)} end) pp(x.map { |i| {:value => i, :double => (i*2)} }) I am wondering why first pp produces: [1, 2, 3] While all the oders are giving: [{:value=>1, :double=>2}, {:value=>2, :double=>4}, {:value=>3, :double=>6}] I assume it has something to do with operator precedence. Where can I find good explanation? It's because you're calling pp x.map and passing a block to pp (which ignores it) As explained in

Advanced JavaScript: Why is this function wrapped in parentheses? [duplicate]

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-11-26 04:32:03
问题 This question already has answers here : Closed 6 years ago . Possible Duplicate: What is the (function() { } )() construct in JavaScript? I came across this bit of JavaScript code, but I have no idea what to make out of it. Why do I get \"1\" when I run this code? What is this strange little appendix of (1) and why is the function wrapped in parentheses? (function(x){ delete x; return x; })(1); 回答1: There are a few things going on here. First is the immediately invoked function expression