parallel.foreach

Parallel.ForEach vs Task.Run and Task.WhenAll

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-11-26 14:03:39
What are the differences between using Parallel.ForEach or Task.Run() to start a set of tasks asynchronously? Version 1: List<string> strings = new List<string> { "s1", "s2", "s3" }; Parallel.ForEach(strings, s => { DoSomething(s); }); Version 2: List<string> strings = new List<string> { "s1", "s2", "s3" }; List<Task> Tasks = new List<Task>(); foreach (var s in strings) { Tasks.Add(Task.Run(() => DoSomething(s))); } await Task.WhenAll(Tasks); In this case, the second method will asynchronously wait for the tasks to complete instead of blocking. However, there is a disadvantage to use Task.Run

How can I convert this foreach code to Parallel.ForEach?

醉酒当歌 提交于 2019-11-26 11:13:30
I am a bit of confused about Parallel.ForEach . What is Parallel.ForEach and what does it exactly do? Please don't reference any MSDN link. Here's a simple example : string[] lines = File.ReadAllLines(txtProxyListPath.Text); List<string> list_lines = new List<string>(lines); foreach (string line in list_lines) { //My Stuff } How can I rewrite this example with Parallel.ForEach ? L.B string[] lines = File.ReadAllLines(txtProxyListPath.Text); List<string> list_lines = new List<string>(lines); Parallel.ForEach(list_lines, line => { //Your stuff }); Jignesh.Raj Foreach loop: Iterations takes place

Parallel.ForEach and async-await

和自甴很熟 提交于 2019-11-26 04:51:51
问题 I had such method: public async Task<MyResult> GetResult() { MyResult result = new MyResult(); foreach(var method in Methods) { string json = await Process(method); result.Prop1 = PopulateProp1(json); result.Prop2 = PopulateProp2(json); } return result; } Then I decided to use Parallel.ForEach : public async Task<MyResult> GetResult() { MyResult result = new MyResult(); Parallel.ForEach(Methods, async method => { string json = await Process(method); result.Prop1 = PopulateProp1(json); result

How can I limit Parallel.ForEach?

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2019-11-26 02:59:00
I have a Parallel.ForEach() async loop with which I download some webpages. My bandwidth is limited so I can download only x pages per time but Parallel.ForEach executes whole list of desired webpages. Is there a way to limit thread number or any other limiter while running Parallel.ForEach? Demo code: Parallel.ForEach(listOfWebpages, webpage => { Download(webpage); }); The real task has nothing to do with webpages, so creative web crawling solutions won't help. You can specify a MaxDegreeOfParallelism in a ParallelOptions parameter: Parallel.ForEach( listOfWebpages, new ParallelOptions {

How can I convert this foreach code to Parallel.ForEach?

孤街醉人 提交于 2019-11-26 02:19:31
问题 I am a bit of confused about Parallel.ForEach . What is Parallel.ForEach and what does it exactly do? Please don\'t reference any MSDN link. Here\'s a simple example : string[] lines = File.ReadAllLines(txtProxyListPath.Text); List<string> list_lines = new List<string>(lines); foreach (string line in list_lines) { //My Stuff } How can I rewrite this example with Parallel.ForEach ? 回答1: string[] lines = File.ReadAllLines(txtProxyListPath.Text); List<string> list_lines = new List<string>(lines)

How can I limit Parallel.ForEach?

梦想与她 提交于 2019-11-26 01:51:50
问题 I have a Parallel.ForEach() async loop with which I download some webpages. My bandwidth is limited so I can download only x pages per time but Parallel.ForEach executes whole list of desired webpages. Is there a way to limit thread number or any other limiter while running Parallel.ForEach? Demo code: Parallel.ForEach(listOfWebpages, webpage => { Download(webpage); }); The real task has nothing to do with webpages, so creative web crawling solutions won\'t help. 回答1: You can specify a

Nesting await in Parallel.ForEach

前提是你 提交于 2019-11-25 22:27:49
问题 In a metro app, I need to execute a number of WCF calls. There are a significant number of calls to be made, so I need to do them in a parallel loop. The problem is that the parallel loop exits before the WCF calls are all complete. How would you refactor this to work as expected? var ids = new List<string>() { \"1\", \"2\", \"3\", \"4\", \"5\", \"6\", \"7\", \"8\", \"9\", \"10\" }; var customers = new System.Collections.Concurrent.BlockingCollection<Customer>(); Parallel.ForEach(ids, async i