overhead

C++ static_cast runtime overhead

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2019-11-26 20:52:37
问题 See the code below. a) Does, in this case (simple inheritance, no virtual members), the static cast in B::df() have any overhead (whatsoever)? I found some conflicting answers to similar questions, that's why I am asking... b) I was thinking about making const M1 * func private in A and introducing a new private field const M2 * func into B to avoid the cast, but it kind of complicates things up and makes use of smart pointers more difficult. Do you see a better way to avoid the cast? class

In what ways do C++ exceptions slow down code when there are no exceptions thown?

怎甘沉沦 提交于 2019-11-26 19:45:29
I have read that there is some overhead to using C++ exceptions for exception handling as opposed to, say, checking return values. I'm only talking about overhead that is incurred when no exception is thrown. I'm also assuming that you would need to implement the code that actually checks the return value and does the appropriate thing, whatever would be the equivalent to what the catch block would have done. And, it's also not fair to compare code that throws exception objects with 45 state variables inside to code that returns a negative integer for every error. I'm not trying to build a

Eclipse crashes with a GC overhead limit exceeded error

爱⌒轻易说出口 提交于 2019-11-26 19:25:01
问题 It's the first time I am using Proguard, I've noticed that if you add many custom rules to proguard-project.txt it takes obviously much more time for building. That's cause Eclipse to crash reporting a GC overhead limit exceeded and then I have to force the shut down of java because the editor continues to pop out error and alert dialogs. Is there any way to avoid these continuous crashes on Eclipse and so fix the problem reported here too? 回答1: Fixed, I read all the others forum posts about

In MySQL what does “Overhead” mean, what is bad about it, and how to fix it?

痴心易碎 提交于 2019-11-26 18:54:24
问题 simple question, but its been nagging me for a while now.... what is "overhead" in MySQL, and should i be worried? does clicking "optimize table" fix it for real? 回答1: It appears that the overhead is temporary diskspace that the database used to run some of the queries, so you should only worry if this gets really high. You can compare 'Optimizing the table' with the defragmenting of your hard drive. I quote: Every database will, over time, require some form of maintenance to keep it at an

Influence on the static scheduling overhead in OpenMP

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-11-26 18:33:49
问题 I thought about which factors would influence the static scheduling overhead in OpenMP. In my opinion it is influenced by: CPU performance specific implementation of the OpenMP run-time library the number of threads But am I missing further factors? Maybe the size of the tasks, ...? And furthermore: Is the overhead linearly dependent on the number of iterations? In this case I would expect that having static scheduling and 4 cores, the overhead increases linearly with 4*i iterations. Correct

Can placement new for arrays be used in a portable way?

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2019-11-26 12:20:59
Is it possible to actually make use of placement new in portable code when using it for arrays? It appears that the pointer you get back from new[] is not always the same as the address you pass in (5.3.4, note 12 in the standard seems to confirm that this is correct), but I don't see how you can allocate a buffer for the array to go in if this is the case. The following example shows the problem. Compiled with Visual Studio, this example results in memory corruption: #include <new> #include <stdio.h> class A { public: A() : data(0) {} virtual ~A() {} int data; }; int main() { const int

Import package.* vs import package.SpecificType [duplicate]

血红的双手。 提交于 2019-11-26 11:40:53
This question already has an answer here: Why is using a wild card with a Java import statement bad? 14 answers Would it suppose any difference regarding overhead to write an import loading all the types within one package ( import java.* ); than just a specific type (i.e. import java.lang.ClassLoader )? Would the second one be a more advisable way to use than the other one? There is not a performance or overhead cost to doing import .* vs importing specific types. However, I consider it to be a best practice to never use import .* My primary reason for this is I just like to keep things

How much overhead does SSL impose?

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-11-26 11:31:05
I know there's no single hard-and-fast answer, but is there a generic order-of-magnitude estimate approximation for the encryption overhead of SSL versus unencrypted socket communication? I'm talking only about the comm processing and wire time, not counting application-level processing. Update There is a question about HTTPS versus HTTP , but I'm interested in looking lower in the stack. (I replaced the phrase "order of magnitude" to avoid confusion; I was using it as informal jargon rather than in the formal CompSci sense. Of course if I had meant it formally, as a true geek I would have

Overhead of a .NET array?

╄→гoц情女王★ 提交于 2019-11-26 05:55:59
问题 I was trying to determine the overhead of the header on a .NET array (in a 32-bit process) using this code: long bytes1 = GC.GetTotalMemory(false); object[] array = new object[10000]; for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) array[i] = new int[1]; long bytes2 = GC.GetTotalMemory(false); array[0] = null; // ensure no garbage collection before this point Console.WriteLine(bytes2 - bytes1); // Calculate array overhead in bytes by subtracting the size of // the array elements (40000 for object[10000] and

Can placement new for arrays be used in a portable way?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2019-11-26 02:56:44
问题 Is it possible to actually make use of placement new in portable code when using it for arrays? It appears that the pointer you get back from new[] is not always the same as the address you pass in (5.3.4, note 12 in the standard seems to confirm that this is correct), but I don\'t see how you can allocate a buffer for the array to go in if this is the case. The following example shows the problem. Compiled with Visual Studio, this example results in memory corruption: #include <new> #include