operator-keyword

Bitwise AND, Bitwise Inclusive OR question, in Java

两盒软妹~` 提交于 2019-11-30 06:58:35
I've a few lines of code within a project, that I can't see the value of... buffer[i] = (currentByte & 0x7F) | (currentByte & 0x80); It reads the filebuffer from a file, stored as bytes, and then transfers then to buffer[i] as shown, but I can't understand what the overall purpose is, any ideas? Thanks As the other answers already stated, (currentByte & 0x7F) | (currentByte & 0x80) is equivalent to (currentByte & 0xFF) . The JLS3 15.22.1 says this is promoted to an int : When both operands of an operator &, ^, or | are of a type that is convertible (§5.1.8) to a primitive integral type, binary

C++: pure virtual assignment operator

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-11-30 05:11:27
问题 why if we have pure virtual assignment operator in a base class, then we implement that operator on the derived class, it give linker error on the base class? currently I only have the following explanation on http://support.microsoft.com/kb/130486 , it said that the behavior is by design since normal inheritance rules does not apply . it is not clear for me, why is it generate linker error by design? can someone give me more clear explanation about this? edit: added my simplified code of

c++ multiple definitions of operator<<

☆樱花仙子☆ 提交于 2019-11-30 01:35:06
I am attempting to override the << operator for a class. The purpose is basically to implement a toString() like behavior for my class, so that sending it to cout will produce useful output. Using a dummy example, I have the code below. When I attempt to compile, I get the foollowing error: $ g++ main.cpp Rectangle.cpp /tmp/ccWs2n6V.o: In function `operator<<(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&, CRectangle const&)': Rectangle.cpp:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `operator<<(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >&, CRectangle const&)' /tmp/ccLU2LLE.o:main.cpp:(.text

new operator for memory allocation on heap

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-11-30 01:29:59
I was looking at the signature of new operator. Which is: void* operator new (std::size_t size) throw (std::bad_alloc); But when we use this operator, we never use a cast. i.e int *arr = new int; So, how does C++ convert a pointer of type void* to int* in this case. Because, even malloc returns a void* and we need to explicitly use a cast. There is a very subtle difference in C++ between operator new and the new operator. (Read that over again... the ordering is important!) The function operator new is the C++ analog of C's malloc function. It's a raw memory allocator whose responsibility is

What's “<?=” operator in C++? [duplicate]

强颜欢笑 提交于 2019-11-30 01:08:46
问题 This question already has answers here : C extension: <? and >? operators (2 answers) Closed 5 years ago . I came across the following code here, which is from the C++ implementation of Dijkstra algorithm using an adjacency matrix. //read in edges keeping only the minimum for(int i=0; i<E; i++) { int v1,v2,tmp; fin >> v1; fin >> v2; fin >> tmp; adjmat[v1][v2]<?=tmp; // <?= sets left to min(left,right) adjmat[v2][v1]<?=tmp; } Pay attention to the last two lines, which apply operator <?= . As

Undefined method '>' for nil:NilClass <NoMethodError>

心已入冬 提交于 2019-11-29 22:27:41
Ok I do have the following code def update_state_actions states.each do |state| @state_turns[state.id] -= 1 if @state_turns[state.id] > 0 && state.auto_removal_timing == 1 end end now in the line of... @state_turns[state.id] -= 1 if @state_turns[state.id] > 0 && state.auto_removal_timing == 1 it says the error in 'block update_state_actions' : Undefined method '>' for nil:NilClass <NoMethodError> what is the cause of the error? how come > is considered as a method but it is a logical operator? Arup Rakshit how come > is considered as a method but it is a logical operator? There is no problem

How to define a static operator<<?

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2019-11-29 22:07:33
问题 Is it possible to define a static insertion operator which operates on the static members of a class only? Something like: class MyClass { public: static std::string msg; static MyClass& operator<< (const std::string& token) { msg.append(token); return *this; // error, static } }; alternatively: static MyClass& operator<< (MyClass&, const std::string &token) { MyClass::msg.append(token); return ?; } This is how I would like to use it: MyClass << "message1" << "message2"; Thank you! 回答1: If

How can I find the operator definition in Swift?

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-11-29 18:44:42
I write code below: let array1: [Int] = [0,1] let array2 = array1 + [2] It just works.I want to find where + operator define. I search ArrayExtension in my workspace without result.I search Apple doc Collection Sequence Array , there is no result. Is there a way to navigate to operator definition ,like CMD + CTRL + J for func You can select the operator in the Xcode source editor, and choose "Navigate -> Jump to definition" from the menu, or press CMD+CTRL+J. (This was broken in Xcode 10, but works again in Xcode 11, which is currently in beta.) 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53651936

How is that x=20;x= ++x + ++x + x++ ;final value of x in java is 65 [duplicate]

时光怂恿深爱的人放手 提交于 2019-11-29 17:55:30
This question already has an answer here: How do the post increment (i++) and pre increment (++i) operators work in Java? 14 answers How is this possible as post increment operator should increase x to 66? When I did the same for y= ++x + ++x + x++; it gave a value 65 for y and 23 for x. So let me know how is java compilers solving these expression. Let Java show you. javap -c MyClass shows you bytecode: public static void main(java.lang.String[]); Code: 0: bipush 20 2: istore_1 3: getstatic #2 // Field java/lang/System.out:Ljava/io/PrintStream; 6: iinc 1, 1 9: iload_1 10: iinc 1, 1 13: iload

Haskell function composition, type of (.)(.) and how it's presented

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-11-29 16:10:09
问题 So i know that: (.) = (f.g) x = f (g x) And it's type is (B->C)->(A->B)->A->C But what about: (.)(.) = _? = _? How this is represented? I thought of: (.)(.) = (f.g)(f.g)x = f(g(f(g x))) // this (.)(.) = (f.g.h)x = f(g(h x)) // or this But as far as i tried to get type of it, it's not correct to what GHCi tells me. So what are both "_?" Also - what does function/operator $ do? 回答1: First off, you're being sloppy with your notation. (.) = (f.g) x = f (g x) -- this isn't true What is true: (.) f