.net-2.0

I'm working on an ASP.Net site which allows users to link documents using a UNC path. This site is used by a customer of ours for internal processes, so all users on their domain should have access to the UNC path. When a user wants to add a linked document, they select the file using a FileUpload control. Previously in .Net 2.0, the control's PostedFile.FileName property returned the filename and the full UNC path. Now we are using .Net 4.0 and it only returns the filename. Here's my main question: Does PostedFile.FileName work differently in .Net 4.0 compared to 2.0? If not, what else could

As described in another SO post of me I saw a strange behaviour of my application after moving from VS 2008 (.net 3.5) to VS 2013 (and using .net 4.0, not 4.5). I found that the static constructor (cctor) of a class was not called any more. Therefore I broke the application down into a small test program: DLLs testAssembly_2-0 and testAssembly_4-0 (similar content; testAssembly_4-0 has names with 40 instead of 20 ) namespace testAssembly_20 { public ref class Class20 { public: Class20 () { Console::WriteLine (__FUNCTION__"()"); } static Class20 () { Console::WriteLine (__FUNCTION__"()" + " ms

A requirement for an ASP.Net 2.0 project I'm working on limits a certain field to a max of 10 words (not characters). I'm currently using a CustomValidator control with the following ServerValidate method: Protected Sub TenWordsTextBoxValidator_ServerValidate(ByVal source As Object, ByVal args As System.Web.UI.WebControls.ServerValidateEventArgs) Handles TenWordsTextBoxValidator.ServerValidate '' 10 words args.IsValid = args.Value.Split(" ").Length <= 10 End Sub Does anyone have a more thorough/accurate method of getting a word count? You can use one of the builtin validators with a regex that

I know there is a way to make enum work for string types with conversions galore - the code doesn't look pretty. Does anyone know of any way to have something like this: public SOMESTRUCTURE SessionKeys : string { value1 = "value1key", value2 = "value2key", name = "name" } so later in my code I could refer to it as: SessionKeys.value1 This is about the best I've come up with. (I haven't compiled it, so the syntax may be off.) public static class SessionKeys { public const string Value1 = "Value1"; public const string Value2 = "Value2"; ... } Reed Copsey Using C# 2.0 - I believe the best option

I assumed there were only bug fixes/(no new types) in .NET 2.0 SP1 until I came across few posts which were mentioning DateTimeOffset structure, that was added in .NET 2.0 SP1. Is there a full listing of the newly added types in .NET 2.0 SP1? D2VIANT Here's what you're looking for: Full Article: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/CatchingRedBitsDifferencesInNET20AndNET20SP1.aspx This may also be helpful: Full Article: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/ChangesInTheNETBCLBetween20And35.aspx There were new interfaces added, like INotifyPropertyChanging, so there were new types added. The question is valid

I have a Windows Forms textbox with background thread updating its value every second. If I place cursor inside textbox it will loose its current position at next update. Same thing with text selection. I tried to solve it like that protected void SetTextProgrammatically(string value) { // save current cursor position and selection int start = textBox.SelectionStart; int length = textBox.SelectionLength; // update text textBox.Text = value; // restore cursor position and selection textBox.SelectionStart = start; textBox.SelectionLength = length; } It works good most of the time. Here is

Imagine the following: I have a table of 57,000 items that i regularly use in my application to figure out things like targeting groups etc. instead of querying the database 300,000 times a day, for a table that hardly ever changes it's data, is there a way to store its information in my application and poll data in memory directly? Or, do I have to create some sort of custom datatype for each row and iterate through testing each row, to check for the results i want? After some googling, the closest thing i could find is in-memory database thank you, - theo SQLite supports in-memory tables.