namespaces

问题 i'm trying to remove blank xmlns from the xml request generated from stub that i've auto-generated from a wsdl using the axis wizard. Axis wizard generates the request class in which there is: private static org.apache.axis.description.TypeDesc typeDesc = new org.apache.axis.description.TypeDesc(Request.class, true); static { typeDesc.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://myNamespace")); org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc elemField = new org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc

问题 In c++ Is it OK to include same namespace twice? compiler wont give any error but still will it affect in anyway Thanks, EDIT: I meant using namespace std; // . . STUFF using namespace std; 回答1: It depends what you mean by 'include'. Saying: using namespace std; ... using namespace std: is OK. But saying: namespace X { ... namespace X { would create a nested namespace called X::X, which is probably not what you wanted. 回答2: This usage is fine, if it's what your talking about: File: foo.h

问题 How does one add an arbitrary namespace using PHP SoapClient? The namespace does not actually get used in the request, but I think it is preventing my message from being properly consumed. The WSDL is here : http://abr.business.gov.au/abrxmlsearchRPC/ABRXMLSearch.asmx?WSDL The documentation for the particular message I want to send is here : http://abr.business.gov.au/abrxmlsearchRPC/(nye2ok45xc42vy552b15dx3t)/FormGenerator/ABRSearchByNameSimpleProtocol.aspx. I'm doing the SOAP request. In

问题 I'm using CakePHP 2.4.5 and PHP 5.5, and would like to use a trait. I have a trait in Utility/VariablesTrait.php called VariablesTrait . To take advantage of namespaces, I've given it a namespace of App\Utility\VariablesTrait , since Utility\VariablesTrait seems a bit too global, and the former would work better with CakePHP 3. In my class that I want to use it in, I have the use App\Utility\VariablesTrait; statement in the class. For backup, I also have a App::uses('VariablesTrait', 'Utility

问题 if I don't put a namespace in my classes (vs.net 2008), which namespace do my classes get built under? update Its strange, when I add a namespace I can't seem to reference the classes methods from my user control. If I explicitly set a namespace, and add a 'using ...' in my control, I still can't see it! How can this be? using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Web; using System.Configuration; /// <summary> /// Summary description for Globals /// <

问题 I have this in routes.rb root :to => "posts#index" devise_for :users, :controllers => { :omniauth_callbacks => "users/omniauth_callbacks" } resources :users, :only => :show resources :boards resources :posts do resources :comments end namespace :users do resources :posts do get :posts, :on => :member end resources :boards do get :boards, :on => :member end end rake routes: boards_users_board GET /users/boards/:id/boards(.:format) {:action=>"boards", :controller=>"users/boards"} users_boards

问题 I know this question has been asked in a similar fashion before, but I can't seem to get this working. I have some xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> <Research xmlns="http://www.rixml.org/2005/3/RIXML" xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xalan" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" createDateTime="2011-03-29T15:41:48Z" language="eng" researchID="MusiJvs3008"> <Product productID="MusiJvs3008"> <StatusInfo currentStatusIndicator="Yes" statusDateTime="2011-03-29T15

问题 I'm attempting to use SimpleXML's addChild method of the SimpleXMLElement (actually a SimpleXMLIterator which is a subclass of SimpleXMLElement) to add child elements. My problem is that the source document contains a mixture of elements with namespaces and without. Here's a simple (no pun intended) example: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <ns1:a xmlns:ns1="http://www.abc.com"> </ns1:a> The PHP code is: $it = new SimpleXMLIterator ('./test.xml', 0, true); $it->addChild('d', 'another!')

问题 This is the code in question that appears in §13.3 of "C++ Primer", 5ed: void swap(Foo &lhs, Foo &rhs) { using std::swap; swap(lhs.h, rhs.h); // uses the HasPtr version of swap // swap other members of type Foo } The book mentions the phenomenon of the class-specific swap not being hidden by the using declaration, and refers reader to §18.2.3: I read that section and realized that this may be related to Argument-Dependent Lookup (ADL). The following is the excerption: But I still have some

问题 I have been looking over some posts here on Stackoverflow, and I have noticed that most people use std:: but some people uses ::std:: I think i have read something about a global scope or something like that in namespaces as a reason to use ::std:: (but i can't find it now, because it was in a comment to an unrelated question) Is there any reason to prefer one way versus the other? 回答1: It's a bad idea to write code like this, but you could : namespace foo { namespace std { int bar; } std: