mutable

Javascript: Using reviver function, I seem can't get to alter all the keys, while concating the numbers

二次信任 提交于 2019-11-28 11:31:29
问题 I just want to change all the keys in batchesX. But I can't seem to alter all keys, because of concat. This is what I learned from post. Please advise how I can change all keys with numbers. var batchesX = '[{"batch":"0010002033"},{"batch":"0010001917"},{"batch":"0000020026"},{"batch":"0000017734"},'+ '{"batch":"0000015376"},{"batch":"0000014442"},{"batch":"0000014434"},{"batch":"0000014426"},'+ '{"batch":"0000013280"},{"batch":"0000012078"},{"batch":"0000012075"},{"batch":"0000012072"},'+ '{

Problems with mutability in a closure

你说的曾经没有我的故事 提交于 2019-11-28 09:36:09
问题 I really don't know how to get past this. As far as I understand it, words is moved into the closure (which is fine by me, it's the only place it's going to be used after this) but needs to be &mut according to typed_some . What the error suggests sounds like a decent idea, it's just that that part is in a library and I don't know if it'd be something they could implement. on_edit documentation. extern crate cursive; extern crate rand; use cursive::Cursive; use cursive::views::{Dialog,

Is there an Iterator-like trait which returns references that must fall out of scope before the next access?

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-11-28 09:08:56
问题 This would make it possible to safely iterate over the same element twice, or to hold some state for the global thing being iterated over in the item type. Something like: trait IterShort<Iter> where Self: Borrow<Iter>, { type Item; fn next(self) -> Option<Self::Item>; } then an implementation could look like: impl<'a, MyIter> IterShort<MyIter> for &'a mut MyIter { type Item = &'a mut MyItem; fn next(self) -> Option<Self::Item> { // ... } } I realize I could write my own (I just did), but I'd

Should mutexes be mutable?

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-11-28 08:51:46
Not sure if this is a style question, or something that has a hard rule... If I want to keep the public method interface as const as possible, but make the object thread safe, should I use mutable mutexes? In general, is this good style, or should a non-const method interface be preferred? Please justify your view. [ Answer edited ] Basically using const methods with mutable mutexes is a good idea (don't return references by the way, make sure to return by value), at least to indicate they do not modify the object. Mutexes should not be const, it would be a shameless lie to define lock/unlock

Mutability of string when string doesn't change in C#

隐身守侯 提交于 2019-11-28 07:05:22
问题 If the string operation doesn't change the value of string, will that end up in creation of a new instance? For example, string str = "foo"; str += ""; I know the difference between string and StringBuilder in C#. 回答1: No, a new instance will be created only when the string operation changes the value in the string variable. It can be proved using the ObjectIDGenerator class. It's worth reading this complete article for proof. using System; using System.Text; using System.Runtime

Are strings in Ruby mutable? [duplicate]

寵の児 提交于 2019-11-28 06:15:17
This question already has an answer here: Are strings mutable in Ruby? 2 answers Consider the following code: $ irb > s = "asd" > s.object_id # prints 2171223360 > s[0] = ?z # s is now "zsd" > s.object_id # prints 2171223360 (same as before) > s += "hello" # s is now "zsdhello" > s.object_id # prints 2171224560 (now it's different) Seems like individual characters can be changed w/o creating a new string. However appending to the string apparently creates a new string. Are strings in Ruby mutable? Yes, strings in Ruby, unlike in Python, are mutable. s += "hello" is not appending "hello" to s -

Which JavaScript Array functions are mutating?

a 夏天 提交于 2019-11-28 04:19:30
I am writing an Array-derived class in JavaScript and need to know which functions to overload so that I can be aware of changes made to the array. I know Array.push() and Array.splice() are mutating. Is there a definitive list of any others? Jonathan Lonowski You can find the list on MDN as Mutator methods (along with Accessor and Iteration methods): copyWithin fill pop push reverse shift sort splice unshift You can also use .concat() , before using your mutation method, to ensure you are not mutating your arrays, eg const dontMutateMe = [4,5,1,2,3]; const sortArray = dontMutateMe.concat()

Mutable borrow in a loop

吃可爱长大的小学妹 提交于 2019-11-28 04:10:53
问题 I have the following code: struct Baz { x: usize, y: usize, } struct Bar { baz: Baz, } impl Bar { fn get_baz_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Baz { &mut self.baz } } struct Foo { bar: Bar, } impl Foo { fn foo(&mut self) -> Option<&mut Baz> { for i in 0..4 { let baz = self.bar.get_baz_mut(); if baz.x == 0 { return Some(baz); } } None } } Rust Playground It fails to compile with: error[E0499]: cannot borrow `self.bar` as mutable more than once at a time --> src/main.rs:23:23 | 23 | let baz = self.bar.get

What is difference between mutable and immutable String in java

泪湿孤枕 提交于 2019-11-28 03:39:56
As per my knowledge, a mutable string can be changed, and an immutable string cannot be changed. Here I want to change the value of String like this, String str="Good"; str=str+" Morning"; and other way is, StringBuffer str= new StringBuffer("Good"); str.append(" Morning"); In both the cases I am trying to alter the value of str . Can anyone tell me, what is difference in both case and give me clear picture of mutable and immutable objects. TheLostMind Case 1: String str = "Good"; str = str + " Morning"; In the above code you create 3 String Objects. "Good" it goes into the String Pool . "

Can I always convert mutable-only algorithms to single-assignment and still be efficient?

拜拜、爱过 提交于 2019-11-28 03:33:06
问题 The Context The context of this question is that I want to play around with Gene Expression Programming (GEP), a form of evolutionary algorithm, using Erlang. GEP makes use of a string based DSL called ' Karva notation '. Karva notation is easily translated into expression parse trees, but the translation algorithm assumes an implementation having mutable objects: incomplete sub-expressions are created early-on the translation process and their own sub-expressions are filled-in later-on with