moq

I am pretty new to use moq . I am into creating some unit test case to HttpModule and everything works fine until I hit a static property as follows this.applicationPath = (HttpRuntime.AppDomainAppVirtualPath.Length > 1) ? HttpRuntime.AppDomainAppVirtualPath : String.Empty; I do not know how create mocks for static class and property like HttpRuntime.AppDomainAppVirtualPath . The context , request and response have been mocked well with sample code I get from moq. I will appreciate if somebody can help me on this. Moq can't fake static members. As a solution you can create a wrapper class

It is my understanding that I can test that a method call will occur if I call a higher level method, i.e.: public abstract class SomeClass() { public void SomeMehod() { SomeOtherMethod(); } internal abstract void SomeOtherMethod(); } I want to test that if I call SomeMethod() then I expect that SomeOtherMethod() will be called. Am I right in thinking this sort of test is available in a mocking framework? Paul You can see if a method in something you have mocked has been called by using Verify, e.g.: static void Main(string[] args) { Mock<ITest> mock = new Mock<ITest>(); ClassBeingTested

I have been doing unit testing recently and I've successfully mocked various scenarios using MOQ framework and MS Test. I know we can't test private methods but I want to know if we can mock static methods using MOQ. Igal Tabachnik Moq (and other DynamicProxy -based mocking frameworks) are unable to mock anything that is not a virtual or abstract method. Sealed/static classes/methods can only be faked with Profiler API based tools, like Typemock (commercial) or Microsoft Moles (free, known as Fakes in Visual Studio 2012 Ultimate /2013 /2015). Alternatively, you could refactor your design to

i've got an integration test that grabs some json result from a 3rd party server. It's really simple and works great. I was hoping to stop actually hitting this server and using Moq (or any Mocking library, like ninject, etc) to hijack and force the return result. is this possible? Here is some sample code :- public Foo GoGetSomeJsonForMePleaseKThxBai() { // prep stuff ... // Now get json please. HttpWebRequest httpWebRequest = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("Http://some.fancypants.site/api/hiThere); httpWebRequest.Method = WebRequestMethods.Http.Get; string responseText; using (var

I'm trying to create a unit test for a class that calls into an async repository. I'm using ASP.NET Core and Entity Framework Core. My generic repository looks like this. public class EntityRepository<TEntity> : IEntityRepository<TEntity> where TEntity : class { private readonly SaasDispatcherDbContext _dbContext; private readonly DbSet<TEntity> _dbSet; public EntityRepository(SaasDispatcherDbContext dbContext) { _dbContext = dbContext; _dbSet = dbContext.Set<TEntity>(); } public virtual IQueryable<TEntity> GetAll() { return _dbSet; } public virtual async Task<TEntity> FindByIdAsync(int id) {

I am using shanselmann's MvcMockHelper class to mock up some HttpContext stuff using Moq but the issue I am having is being able to assign something to my mocked session object in my MVC controller and then being able to read that same value in my unit test for verification purposes. My question is how do you assign a storage collection to the mocked session object to allow code such as session["UserName"] = "foo" to retain the "foo" value and have it be available in the unit test. I started with Scott Hanselman's MVCMockHelper , added a small class and made the modifications shown below to